Now that you have a list of the concrete skills that your learners will develop in your workshop, it’s time to start the second step of backward design - designing the challenges that you will use to help your learners practice those skills. These challenges will also enable the instructors to evaluate learner’s skill progression in real time and re-direct their teaching as needed. Carpentries workshops use real-world data to increase the immediate applicability of our lessons and to reduce cognitive load for the learner. The first step towards developing the exercises you will use in your lessons is to select an appropriate dataset.
The dataset is a critical element of a Carpentries lesson. It needs to be chosen carefully and to meet the following criteria.
Use a single dataset – Curricula are domain-specific and the same dataset should be used across all lessons that are part of the same curriculum. When developing a standalone lesson (one that is not part of a curriculum), we encourage you to choose a dataset that is already in use in one of our existing curricula. Although each lesson should use the same dataset, it is often appropriate to use variations of the core dataset for different lessons within a curriculum. For instance, the Data Carpentry lessons on data organization with spreadsheets use messy spreadsheets that have been created from the original dataset, but which introduce formatting issues to teach tidy data principles. Whenever possible, these derived datasets should be created using scripts rather than manually, so they can be regenerated if the original dataset changes.
The dataset should be released under a CC0 license – Copyright laws and laws governing use and sharing of data and databases vary among countries. The Creative Commons Zero (CC0) license is designed to allow unrestricted use and sharing of data universally. The CC0 license allows the development of lessons around the dataset and modification of the dataset to suit our teaching needs.
The dataset should be deposited in a public repository – All variations of the dataset that are used in the lesson should be deposited. The Carpentries deposits data for our lessons on figshare. If you choose another option, make sure the repository where the data is archived has the following features:
- a DOI link pointing to an overview of the dataset
- pre-registration of the DOI
- all files can be downloaded directly as an archive (e.g., zip file) with a persistent link
- each file can be downloaded directly with a persistent link
- the repository supports versioning
The dataset should be real and represent what researchers in the field encounter – The datasets used as examples in the lessons should be based on real research datasets, and be of sufficient complexity that they are representative of the type of dataset that learners would encounter in their own research.
Authors of the dataset should be identifiable, acknowledged, and there should be a link to the original source for the data – Even though the datasets we use in our lessons are released under a CC0 license, we acknowledge the authors of the dataset and link to the research projects based on the data we use.
The dataset should be large enough – Analysing the dataset should represent a real challenge that highlights the power and usefulness of the tools covered in the lessons. The dataset should be larger than what would be easy to analyze and manipulate in a spreadsheet program. It should be similar in size to what researchers in that domain work with in their actual research. For instance, the core dataset for the Data Carpentry Ecology curriculum has ~35,000 rows.
The dataset should be complex enough to ask interesting questions – Each observation should have at least 4-5 variables. These variables should be of a few different data types (at least continuous, discrete, integers, real numbers; and depending on the domain, may include more specialized data types such as date/time, GPS coordinates, unstructured text, etc.)
The motivation for study and the protocol for data collection should be understandable without much context – We have limited time in our workshops to cover the technical skills we want to teach. It should not take long to explain to learners what the data is about, how it was collected, and what types of interesting questions can be asked from it.
The dataset should be relevant in different geographical and cultural contexts – Our workshops are taught to learners from diverse cultural and geographical backgrounds. The dataset should be understandable without much cultural context or pre-requisite knowledge needed to make it compelling.
There should be clear and comprehensive metadata – The metadata should include a description of the data, explain what is included in each data field, how it was measured, and the unit in which it is reported.
Overall, datasets used in Carpentries workshops should serve as examples of publicly deposited data suitable for research re-use. Learners should be able to use these datasets as examples and guides for their own research data that they would like to publish and make available to the broad scientific and academic community.
A possible challenge when using research datasets for teaching is that the dataset can include complexity that makes teaching more difficult by unnecessarily increasing learners’ cognitive load. While it is important for the dataset to provide an authentic experience for learners, it is often useful to simplify it or do some initial data cleaning and wrangling to make it easier for learners to focus on the core skills you are teaching. For instance, you may want to edit the dataset so that missing values are parsed appropriately. You may also want to remove data which leads to errors or warnings during parsing, columns with data types that are not relevant for the learning objectives of the workshops, or variables which require additional context to understand.
When preparing a dataset for teaching, aim to find a balance between providing an authentic experience for learners while keeping complexity low to limit distractions from the learning objectives. Depending on the lesson’s goals, it might also be interesting to include several versions of the datasets that have undergone various levels of processing. At the beginning of the lesson, you can provide a clean and well organized dataset, while later you can introduce more complexity and teach learners how to handle it to generate the cleaner version of the data. Don’t introduce too many (no more than three) versions of the dataset in your lessons, as dealing with many files and remembering their differences can become challenging for the learners.
Once the dataset is in place, you can start to design challenges that provide learners an opportunity to practice the skills that you’ve included in your skills list. Writing the challenges before writing the content of the lesson ensures that the lesson will remain focused, and can reveal gaps in your skills list.
The challenges in a lesson should be a mixture of direct application challenges and synthesis challenges. A direct application challenge is a straightforward implementation of a concept that learners have just been exposed to, while a synthesis challenge requires learners to integrate recently learned skills with skills that were covered earlier in the lesson. Learning is reinforced when Instructors explicitly point out how the skills seen in earlier parts of the lesson are being integrated to solve the challenges.
Challenges in Carpentries lessons are a form of formative assessment. They help learners further their learning by having a chance to put into practice the skills being taught. They also help Instructors monitor the level of understanding in the classroom, and potentially catch misconceptions in the learner’s mental models that can be corrected in real time, before they become ingrained.
When starting to design challenges, it is helpful to start by planning the last exercise of each episode. This will help you keep the big picture in mind and ensure that the rest of the exercises you develop lead up to this larger goal. These final challenges are also the most likely to be “unscaffolded”, and so are easier to develop without detailed knowledge of the various types of exercises discussed later in this chapter. So you can go ahead and draft those final challenges now before reading the rest!
There are many different types of challenge questions that can be developed. In this section, we introduce a few common types of challenges, in order of increasing difficulty (for the learner). When planning your exercises, keep in mind that you will need at least one exercise for every 10-15 minutes of instruction (and more is better!). To quickly estimate how many exercises you need to develop, divide the number of minutes of total delivery time (the number of minutes your learners will be in their seats) by 20. For example, a two hour lesson needs around six exercises. As a rough estimate, plan 8 minutes for each exercise (including discussion of the solution and questions) and 12 minutes of instructional time between exercises.
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) can be a useful tool for formative assessment if they are designed such that each incorrect answer helps the Instructor to identify learners’ misconceptions. Each incorrect answer should be a plausible distractor with diagnostic power. “Plausible” means that an answer looks like it could be right, and “diagnostic power” means that each of the distractors helps the instructor figure out what concepts learners are having difficulty with.
For example, if learners are learning about subsetting data in
R with the
select(), you might ask them, using the
palmerpenguins dataset to determine which of the
following code blocks will return only the values of the “species” and “body_mass_g” variables
for observations from the Dream island collected after 2007.
This is the correct answer.
Learners who select this answer have a factual misconception. They have confused the
filter() functions. They need to be reminded that
filter() is for
subsetting by row and
select() is for subsetting by column.
Learners who select this answer have a conceptual misunderstanding that may require more
time and effort to correct. They haven’t understood that the pipe (
%>%) character only
passes into the next command the output of the previous command, and nothing else. Since
they have used the
select() function first, the “island” column is no longer present
in the output and cannot be used for comparison. This misconception might be addressed by
drawing a diagram and walking through what the data looks like at each step of the command.
Another follow-up question using the same skills could then be used to assess whether learners
have understood the concept.
As illustrated above, formative assessments are most powerful when an instructor modifies their instruction depending on the results of the assessment. An instructor may learn they need to change their pace or review a particular concept. Knowing how to respond to the results of a formative assessment is a skill that you will develop over time. Making sure your assessments are designed to test only one or two concepts at a time will help ensure that the feedback is useful.
The process of developing diagnostic plausible distractors takes time and requires some knowledge of what common misconceptions are for a particular topic. This knowledge can come through teaching experience (yourself or others’) and is sometimes formally defined through concept inventories. One strength of The Carpentries community is that our lessons are taught over and over again by different Instructors in different teaching contexts. Some of those Instructors give feedback on challenges and misconceptions that their learners had. Our exercises are thus continuously improved by pooling the teaching experience of our 1,500+ strong Instructor community!
One reason well-designed multiple choice questions are so useful is that they constrain the problem space. Learners don’t need to worry about all of the details of syntax and how to spell all of the variable names, but can focus on just the concepts that the exercise author intended them to focus on. Another type of formative assessment that provides this benefit are Parson’s problems. A Parson’s problem is an exercise where learners are given a set of items (in our case, lines of code) and asked to put them into an appropriate order to accomplish a specific task. The MCQ example given above could be formulated as a Parson’s problem:
A more difficult version of a Parson’s problem might include lines that are not part of the solution (distractors):
If this is the case, make sure learners know that not all of the code chunks need to be included in their answer!
Parson’s problems are somewhat less structured than MCQs, which makes them slightly better for preparing learners to tackle similar problems in their own work. However, this also makes it more difficult for Instructors to diagnose learner misconceptions and adjust their teaching accordingly (because there are more possible responses). As will all of the challenge types we will discuss in this chapter, MCQs and Parson’s problems can be used in combination to provide learners with both structure and appropriate levels of challenge.
Fill-in-the blank problems can be thought of as the next level of decreasing structure after MCQs and Parson’s problems (although this depends on the number of lines in the Parson’s problem and the number of possible choices for filling in the blanks, among other factors). The following challenge (from the Software Carpentry lesson on The Unix Shell) illustrates one possible application of fill-in-the-blank problems:
After running the following commands, Jamie realizes that she put the files
maltose.datinto the wrong folder:
Fill in the blanks to move these files to the current folder (i.e., the one she is currently in):
..refers to the parent directory (i.e. one above the current directory) and that
.refers to the current directory.
We can also apply this concept to our earlier example and ask learners to fill-in-the-blanks to build a code block that will return only the values of the “species” and “body_mass_g” variables and only for observations from the “Dream” island collected after 2007:
The difficulty of a fill-in-the-blank problem can be adjusted by changing the number of blanks, and by providing (or not providing) a “word bank” of options to use. You can even use a series of similar fill-in-the-blank problems, increasing the number of blanks each time, to prepare learners to build a code chunk without scaffolding. When used in this way, fill-in-the-blank problems are also called faded examples. We discuss the use of faded examples, and why they are a useful tool, in more detail in our Instructor Training course.
Once learners have had an opportunity to practice using a concept in the same context as it was originally taught (direct application challenges), it’s time to stretch their understanding by asking them to apply the same concept in a different context. This adds realism and makes learners better prepared to apply these concepts to unique problems in their own work. This type of exercise will often require learners to proactively look up help files or do a Google search.
For example, in the Data Carpentry lesson Data Analysis and Visualization in Python for Ecologists,
plotting is taught using the
plotnine package. That package implements the grammar of graphics developed by
Leland Wilkinson, which includes the concept
of a plot’s geometry. Different plot types have different underlying geometries that interact
differently with other plot parameters. In this lesson, learners are led through an example
where they create a scatterplot (using
geom_point()) of weight versus an animal’s hindfoot
They are then asked to create a barchart showing the number of observations in each region (or “plot”) of the field site.
Working on the
surveys_completedata set, use the
plot-idcolumn to create a
bar-plot that counts the number of records for each plot. (Check the documentation of the bar geometry to handle the counts)
To answer this problem, learners need to locate and decipher the appropriate help file (for
geom_bar() function). They also need to change the
mapping attribute to apply to “plot_id” rather than “weight” and “hindfoot_length”. Later challenges in this lesson require
learners to apply multiple concepts in new contexts, for example, modifying both the plot type
and underlying aesthetics like color.
These types of problems are incredibly powerful, as they provide the most realistic example we’ve discussed so far of the skills learners will need to be able to apply what they’ve learned to their own work. This also means, however, that these problems are fairly unstructured, and include many more potential areas for learners to get off track. It is also very easy, when designing these problems, to make them more difficult than you intended - either by requiring learners to apply multiple concepts in new contexts or by including new concepts that haven’t yet been covered in the lesson. Be careful, always have your lesson reviewed by at least one novice user if possible, and above all else, be prepared for feedback from Instructors “in the field” about how to improve these (and all of your) challenge problems.