Content from Introduction
Last updated on 2022-12-07 | Edit this page
Estimated time 15 minutes
Overview
Questions
- What is covered in this training?
- Who are the trainers?
- Who is participating?
Objectives
- Explain how trainers and participants will interact throughout the workshop.
- Summarise the main skills that will be taught in this workshop.
You might like to make a copy of the template CodiMD notetaking page and share your link with trainees so that you can take notes together during the training.
Note: some of the content in this course is reproduced or adapted from The Carpentries Instructor Training curriculum.
Pronouns and Names
Using correct names and pronouns (e.g. “she/her”) is important to setting a tone of respect. Learning these is hard to do quickly, so we recommend displaying it prominently during the workshop.
In an online workshop, give everyone a moment to update their display name to reflect how they would like to be addressed.
At an in-person event, we recommend supplying name tags and markers, or using plain paper to create table-displayed name placards.
Note that pronouns are personal and some participants might prefer not to share them. Do not force people to share their pronouns.
Before The Training Begins
Getting to Know Each Other
If the Trainer has chosen an icebreaker question, participate by writing your answers in the shared document for the workshop.
Code of Conduct
To make clear what is expected, everyone participating in The Carpentries activities is required to abide by our Code of Conduct. Any form of behaviour to exclude, intimidate, or cause discomfort is a violation of the Code of Conduct. In order to foster a positive and professional learning environment we encourage you to:
- Use welcoming and inclusive language
- Be respectful of different viewpoints and experiences
- Gracefully accept constructive criticism
- Focus on what is best for the community
- Show courtesy and respect towards other community members
If you believe someone is violating the Code of Conduct, we ask that you report it to The Carpentries Code of Conduct Committee by completing this form.
Today’s Trainers
To begin class, each Trainer should give a brief introduction of themselves.
(For some guidelines on introducing yourself, see the Workshop Introductions section of the Instructor Training curriculum).
Now, we would like to get to know all of you.
Our First Exercise (10 minutes)
What was the best lesson you ever followed (were taught in a class, read through online, read in a book)? Try to differentiate between what was good about the performance of the teacher/trainer and what was good about the content of the lesson itself. Take a few minutes to write down some notes about your answer, then introduce yourself to the other participants and tell them about it.
Collaborative Lesson Development Training Overview
The main objective of this training is to teach you the skills you need to design and develop an effective lesson, in collaboration with other members of the community. During the training, we will introduce the steps you can take to design and develop a lesson to meet the needs of your target audience, and give you time to begin implementing those steps during the workshop itself.
We will focus on three main areas:
Designing a Lesson
Much of the training will discuss a process to incorporate good practices in lesson design. We will explore how defining the specific skills you wish to teach early on in the development process provides a foundation from which you can build a stronger, more impactful lesson.
Building a Lesson Website
Throughout the training, while you design and begin developing the content of your lessons, we will teach you how to incorporate this into an organised and accessible website using our lesson infrastructure.
Collaborating Effectively
We believe that lessons are much more likely to succeed, and to remain useful in the long term, if they are developed collaboratively. This training will discuss some of the ways that you can welcome new collaborators and work effectively and efficiently with those you already have.
Learning How to Teach a Lesson
This training will focus on the content - how to prepare a good lesson. More about the performance - how to deliver a lesson most effectively - is covered in The Carpentries Instructor Training.
Content from Lesson Design
Last updated on 2022-12-07 | Edit this page
Estimated time 20 minutes
Overview
Questions
- What are the recommended steps to take when developing a new lesson?
- What lesson do you want to develop during and after this workshop?
Objectives
- Explain the lesson design process we will be adopting for this course.
- Summarise the lessons that participants will be working on.
A Lesson Design Process
In order to design an effective lesson, we need a structured approach with the learner in mind and clearly identified goals. Throughout this training, we will use a modified version of Nicholl’s five phase paradigm for curriculum design. Nicholl’s paradigm describes a process, commonly referred to as backward design, where those who wish to develop a new curriculum first begin by defining exactly what their learners will be able to do after they have completed the lesson/training/course. The subsequent stages of the curriculum design process involve designing content to directly meet those stated outcomes.
- Select learning outcomes
- Choose learning experiences to help learners achieve these outcomes
- Develop content to support these experiences
- Assess learner progress towards desired outcomes
- Evaluate chosen outcomes, experiences, and content based on this assessment
TODO: add a figure illustrating the setps in the list above. could be based on Fig. 2 in f1000-course-design-guide
The last two phases of Nicholl’s paradigm involve assessing learner progress towards the desired learning outcomes and evaluating the stated objectives and current content in light of the results of that assessment. In The Carpentries, most workshops are relatively short-format, without room for an extensive assessment after the teaching has finished (a summative assessment). To account for this, our lessons place an emphasis on formative assessment: assessment of learner progress that takes place while the teaching is still going on, to give instructors opportunities to evaluate the teaching and lesson content before the end of the workshop.
To account for this, we have adapted Nicholl’s five phases in this training, to place an emphasis on assessing learning during a workshop:
- Define desired learning outcomes
- Decide with what activities/examples/explanations we will try to teach these skills
- Create assessments to determine progress towards desired outcomes
- Write content to lead learners from one of these assessments to the next
- (After the break) evaluate how closely the outcomes meet the objectives
TODO: add a figure illustrating the process described in the list above. could be similar to the one used earlier for Nicholl’s original list.
Your Lessons
This training will provide many opportunities for discussion of your lessons. Providing some context now for the lessons that you will be creating will help the Trainers and other participants get involved in those discussions and give you feedback as you follow the process.
Discussion (10 minutes)
Take a few minutes to think about your answers to the following questions:
- What is the topic of the lesson that you plan to develop based on this training?
- Have you created training material on this topic before?
- What is motivating you to create this lesson?
Make some notes, then share a single-sentence answer to each question with the other participants.
Content from Identifying Your Target Audience
Last updated on 2022-12-07 | Edit this page
Estimated time 45 minutes
Overview
Questions
- Why is it so important to think about the target audience early in the process?
- How can you ensure that your lesson reaches the right audience?
Objectives
- Describe the importance of aligning lesson design with the intended audience.
- Compose a list of prior knowledge required to follow a lesson.
Target Audience
Given the limited time in a short-format training, it is vital to define the scope of the lesson i.e. what people will know before and after the lesson. Thinking carefully about the target audience will help you with this and defining desired learning outcomes (the first step of the lesson design). Prominently displaying a description of the target audience will also help attract people with the right motivation and relevant prior knowledge to attend your workshops.
Expertise
One of the most important things we can identify about our target audience is the level of expertise they will already have in relation to the skills taught by your lesson. In The Carpentries Instructor Training curriculum, we describe three different stages of skill acquisition: novice, competent practitioner, and expert and how it directly correlates to the complexity of mental models these different groups have about a domain/topic.
Briefly, the novice is someone who does not know what they do not know, i.e., they do not yet know what the key ideas in the domain are or how they relate, the competent practitioner has enough understanding of the domain/topic for everyday purposes, and the expert is someone who can easily handle situations that are out of the ordinary and can immediately use their prior knowledge or skills when presented with a new problem in the domain.
When designing a new lesson, it is important to think about the level of expertise that you expect learners to arrive with for two reasons:
- It helps to predict what prior knowledge and mental
model learners will have of the lesson domain when they arrive. This
can enable you to make progress quickly by
- working to help learners recall (activate) that prior knowledge,
- building on the conceptual understanding they already have and,
- perhaps most importantly, giving you some idea of what misconceptions they might arrive with. It is vital that misconceptions are identified and corrected early on, before learners try to incorporate new knowledge into a broken mental model.
- People at different stages of this process need to be taught differently. For example, novices will learn more from lessons that include worked examples and are more tutorial-like i.e. focused on a specific task, with step-by-step explanations of the process, but without a lot of extra information that is not directly relevant. However, the same approach may actually hinder learning for competent practitioners who may be distracted by a step-by-step explanation of something they already have the prior knowledge of. For learners at this level of expertise, lessons which include activities offering learners the freedom to explore options and develop their own solutions, are likely to be more effective.
Motivation
Furthermore, your lesson will be more effective if it aligns with the motivations of the target audience. Understanding the wants and needs of your target audience, what they know already and what kinds of problems they want to solve, will help you design a lesson that learners can see the value in. It will give them the impression that taking the lesson will be worthwhile (called positive expectancies in the literature).
We will look more at strategies to establish value and build positive expectancies in the next episode.
Be Specific
It can be tempting to identify a target audience only in vague terms, for example by writing that a lesson is aimed at “PhD students” or “early career researchers”. However, taking the time to focus on real people, or imagined personae, who represent your target audience will help you take time to consider the various aspects that can influence how much someone will learn from your lesson. It will also help you notice when the assumptions you are making about your target audience are unreasonable.
Most of all, it will help you stay connected to the fact that you are not your learners: they will arrive at the lesson with different priorities, interests, and challenges than your own.
Exercise: thinking about target audience (15 minutes total for both parts)
Part 1 (all, 5 minutes): think about a member of the target audience for your lesson, and answer the following questions in the context of your lesson topic:
- What is their background?
- What do they already know how to do?
- What do they want to do with the skills they will learn from your lesson?
- What problem will your lesson help them solve?
Share your answers with your collaborators. How do they compare? If you have identified different audiences, are they compatible? Or would your time be better spent focussing on one particular audience for this lesson?
Write 1-2 diagnostic questions, for use before the lesson is taught, to help you assess whether a respondent falls within the intended audience for your lesson.
Thinking more about target audience
There is more to consider about your target audience than we could capture with only the questions listed above. In your own time, you should think more about the other considerations you might need to make when writing a lesson for your audience.
For example, what vocabulary do they use? The terms you are teaching in your lesson might have a different meaning in your learners’ domain of expertise, and it can be helpful to prepare for and try to avoid confusion arising from this clash. Furthermore, might their primary language differ from yours? If so, how might this change the way you write the lesson?
Defining Prerequisite Knowledge
A very common challenge encountered in workshops is heterogeneity of expertise among the audience. When learners arrive at a workshop with a wide range of previous experience with the topic, it is difficult for the instructors to keep everyone engaged. Those who arrive with too little relevant knowledge and experience can struggle to follow the lesson content at the pace you expect, while those who arrive with too much are likely to become bored and despondent as their expectation of learning new skills is not met.
One way to try to guard against this is to publish the description of your target audience when you advertise a workshop teaching your lesson, alongside a list summarising the skills and conceptual knowledge you expect learners to arrive with. Another is to use the information you have about your target audience to ask questions of potential learners when they apply/register to join the workshop (like the diagnostic questionnaire you may have prepared in the exercise above), and use the answers they give to filter out those who fall outside your intended audience.
While valuable, this kind of pre-assessment should be approached with caution: people are often bad at self-assessment i.e. estimating our own ability to perform a task. We can try to mitigate for this when designing the questions for a pre-workshop survey, leaving little room for inaccurate self-assessment to confound the results. But experience suggests it is very difficult to ensure that every learner in a workshop falls within the intended audience of a lesson.
Exercise: defining prerequisite knowledge (5 minutes)
Write a list of the skills/knowledge your learners will be required to have before they can follow your lesson.
If you are struggling with this exercise because your lesson audience is novices, think about skills like touch typing, using a web browser, or interacting with a command line or graphical interface. These are skills commonly overlooked by experts and competent practitioners.
Keypoints
- We recommend an iterative lesson design process that begins with identifying the target audience, before defining learning outcomes, then creating assessments, writing explanatory content, and evaluating the lesson in a workshop.
- Thinking about the target audience early in the design process helps to ensure that your lesson is built around the needs and motivations of real people.
- Use the description of your target audience to help attract people with the appropriate interests and prior knowledge to your lesson.
Content from Break
Last updated on 2022-02-01 | Edit this page
Estimated time 0 minutes
Take a break. If you can, move around and look at something away from your screen to give your eyes a rest.
Content from Defining Lesson Objectives/Outcomes
Last updated on 2022-12-07 | Edit this page
Estimated time 80 minutes
Overview
Questions
- How can describing the things you intend to teach aid the process of writing a lesson?
- How can you be specific and realistic about what you will teach in your lesson?
- What are some of the risks associated with unrealistic or undefined expectations of a lesson?
Objectives
- Explain the importance of defining specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time-bound objectives for a lesson.
- Evaluate a written lesson objective according to these criteria.
At this stage of the training, you should have a clear idea of who the target audience is for your lesson, and what knowledge, skills, and abilities you expect them to arrive with. Now it is time to consider the additional knowledge, skills, and abilities they will have by the time they leave: these are the learning outcomes of your lesson. It can feel strange to jump from one end of the process to the other like this, but clearly defining your goals early in the lesson development process is vital. As we will see in this episode, it helps you to determine the activities, examples, etc. that are appropriate for the lesson content, and provides a scope for what should and should not be included.
Why Focus on Skills?
To ensure your audience stays motivated, and your lesson feels relevant to them, we recommend that lessons focus on teaching skills rather than tools. Lessons should be centred around what you are empowering learners to do, what will be most beneficial to them, rather than a list of functions or commands you are teaching them to use. Placing the emphasis on skills over tools will help you prioritise key concepts and consider how your lesson can have the biggest impact on the way learners do their work.
Learning Objectives
The desired outcomes (the learning objectives) of a lesson should be new skills, i.e. things that the learner can do. For the vast majority of lessons, these will be cognitive skills: things learners can do with their minds. (Lessons intended to teach other kinds of skill, such as woodwork, playing a musical instrument, or making sushi, are probably better suited to a different platform than a static website.) Cognitive skills cannot be equally easily acquired: before we can apply concepts and create something new, we must attain the ability to remember and distinguish between new concepts. Remembering and distinguishing are also abilities that are often faster to gain then applying or creating.
We must try to be realistic about how far along this scale we can move learners during a single workshop/lesson. This is one reason why the target audience is so important: if we can predict what learners will know when they arrive at the lesson, we can better define the outcomes we can expect when they leave.
Defining objectives for a lesson is essential because it allows us to focus the rest of our time on developing content that is necessary for learners to reach these goals. It will help us ensure we do not miss anything important or, conversely, include anything superfluous that could use up valuable time or distract instructors and learners.
What Does an Objective Look Like?
Objectives can be defined for a lesson as a whole - what should learners be able to do at the end of a workshop teaching this lesson? - and for individual sections within it - what should learners be able to do after following this particular part of the lesson? The objectives for the current section of this training are:
These should be read as if they were endings to a sentence beginning
“At the end of this session, learners should be able to …”
Each objective starts with a verb and describes one (and only one) skill the learner will obtain.
For objectives to be as helpful as possible, they need to be written in a way that will allow us to directly observe whether or not a learner has attained the skills we want them to. This means that the skills described by our objectives should be measurable: as a general rule, action verbs such as “explain,” “choose,” or “predict,” are more helpful than passive verbs such as “know,” “understand,” or “appreciate”, which are hard to directly assess and are often open to interpretation.
A popular aid for defining learning objectives is Bloom’s Taxonomy, which divides cognitive skills into several categories. The original taxonomy arranged these categories in a strict hierarchy, which has since been disputed. Regardless of whether these skills conform to such a hierarchy, Bloom’s Taxonomy serves as a very useful bank of action verbs for use in learning objectives.
We will see how helpful it can be to use action verbs in learning objectives when we begin talking about exercise design in the coming episodes.
SMART Objectives
To assist you in defining and writing learning objectives for your lesson, it can be helpful to turn to a popular framework for defining goals: SMART.
SMART objectives should be:
- Specific: they should clearly describe a particular skill or ability the learner should have.
- Measurable: it should be possible to observe and ascertain when the learner has learned the skill/abilities described in the objectives.
- Attainable: the learner should realistically be able to acquire the skills or abilities in the time available in a workshop/by following the text of the lesson.
- Relevant: they should be relevant to the overall topic or domain of the lesson as a whole.
- Time-bound: they should include some timeframe within which the goal will be reached. For learning objectives, this is built into the approach described above.
You may find this template of a Markdown table useful to share with your trainees before they complete the next exercise.
MARKDOWN
| Objective | Action verb? | Specific | Measurable | Attainable |
|-----------|--------------|----------|------------|------------|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | | | 3 | | | | |
Note: if you are using the template CodiMD for notes, you will find this template table for the exercise included there.
If you are using Etherpad for collaborative notes in your training, you can use the template table for Etherpad instead.
Exercise: evaluating learning objectives (15 minutes)
Look at the example learning objectives below. Fill in the table for each objective, checking off the cells if you think an objective meets the criteria or leaving it unchecked if not. You should assume each objective is for a lesson to be taught in a two-day workshop. Note down any observations you make as you move through the list. If you have time, try to imagine the titles of lessons that would have these objectives. This part of the exercise should take 10 minutes.
At the end of this lesson, learners will be able to:
- create formatted page content with Markdown.
- program with Rust.
- fully understand GitHub Actions.
Objective | Action verb? | Specific | Measurable | Attainable |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 |
In the last five minutes of the exercise, we will discuss as a group how each objective might be improved.
Objective | Action verb? | Specific | Measurable | Attainable |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ✅ | ❓ | ❓ | ✅ |
2 | ❓ | ❌ | ❌ | ❓ |
3 | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❓ |
Objective 1 is the closest to what we ideally want in a lesson objective, but it illustrates how difficult it can be to make an objective truly specific. For example, a more specific and measurable version of this objective could be:
write links, headings and bold and italicised text with Markdown.
Lesson Scope
One of the major challenges of lesson design is choosing what to include in a lesson: what the main points will be, in what order they will be introduced, how much detail can be provided, and how much time can be spent on each point. Especially when writing lessons for short form training like a Carpentries workshop, difficult decisions often need to be made about what can and cannot be included. Trying to fit too much content into a lesson is counter-productive, so it is good to avoid the temptation to cram in more content than you have time to cover properly.
Writing learning objectives is a good opportunity to begin thinking about this lesson scope, and can provide assistance when you are faced with a difficult decision about what content to cut out.
For instance, consider the order in which new skills must be acquired. Before learners can begin to acquire “higher-level” cognitive skills to perform creative and analytical tasks, they must first acquire the foundational knowledge and conceptual understanding of the domain. Furthermore, these higher-level skills take longer to acquire so, unless you can expect your target audience to arrive at the lesson with the relevant foundational knowledge and understanding, it is probably unrealistic to aim to have learners completing creative tasks before its end.
As should become clear through activities in the upcoming episodes, lessons can be broadly considered as blocks of content associated with a particular learning objective. This can be helpful when making choices about content to remove, because the task can be considered in the context of taking out whole learning objectives.
Defining Learning Objectives
We have discussed the importance of defining objectives early in the lesson design process, and looked at some examples of objectives written for other lessons. Now it is time to begin defining objectives for your own.
Exercise: defining objectives for your lesson (20 minutes)
Write learning objectives for your lesson - what do you want learners to be able to do at the end of the workshop? When writing these lesson-level objectives, try to follow the SMART framework: make them specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound.
Exercise: reviewing lesson objectives (15 minutes)
Swap objectives written in the previous exercise with a partner (you can also explain or show them what you wrote about your target audience, but this not essential) and review them with the following questions in mind:
- Are the objectives clear?
- Do they use “action” verbs?
- Could you directly observe whether a learner had reached this objective?
Now run the objectives through this Lesson Objective Advisor tool from the University of Manchester’s Faculty of Science and Engineering. Do the results match your assessment?
- Where do the skills described in these objectives sit on the scale?
- (optional) Are these objectives realistic, given the target audience of the lesson?
Keypoints
- Defining objectives for a lesson can help to focus your content on the most important outcomes, and outline the scope of the project.
- Following the SMART framework can help make your learning objectives as useful as possible.
- Leaving objectives unrealistic or undefined increases the risk of a lesson losing focus or spending time on activities that do not help learners gain the most important skills.
Content from Break
Last updated on 2022-02-01 | Edit this page
Estimated time 0 minutes
Take a break. If you can, move around and look at something away from your screen to give your eyes a rest.
Content from The Carpentries Workbench
Last updated on 2023-03-17 | Edit this page
Estimated time 65 minutes
Overview
Questions
- How is a lesson site set up and published with GitHub?
- What are the essential configuration steps for a new lesson?
- How do you create and modify the pages in a lesson?
Objectives
- Identify the key tools used in The Carpentries lesson infrastructure.
- Complete the fundamental setup steps for a new lesson repository.
- Edit Markdown files using the GitHub web interface.
At this stage in the training, you should have a clear idea of who the people are that you want to teach this lesson to, and what exactly the skills are that you want them to learn while they are following it. It is time to begin creating a website that will present that lesson to the world!
GitHub Pages
The source of all The Carpentries lessons is made publicly-available in repositories on GitHub. By making our repositories public like this, we encourage others to help us maintain and improve our lessons, and make it as easy as possible for them to re-use and modify our lessons for their own purposes.
GitHub provides a hosting service to open source projects such as these, allowing users to present their projects to the wider world. The repository includes a complete history of the changes made between versions of the individual files in the project, and provides many features that facilitate collaboration on projects. We will learn more about some of those collaborative features later in this training. For now, we will focus on one other important feature that GitHub provides: website hosting.
Via a system called GitHub Pages, users can build and host websites from the files present in any repository on GitHub. For many years, this has been how The Carpentries presents its lesson websites to the world.
Using The Carpentries Workbench
Carpentries lesson websites are built with The Carpentries Workbench, a toolkit that converts Markdown and RMarkdown files into the HTML that can be served by GitHub Pages. We will use it now to initialise a new lesson.
A Brief History of The Carpentries Lesson Infrastructure
In the past, our lesson sites were generated by software called Jekyll, a tool built into GitHub Pages that allows the webpage content, written in the text files of the repository, to be combined with descriptions of settings, structure, and styling, to create a website. The template used by Jekyll to structure and style lessons was initially developed in 2013/2014 by Abby Cabunoc Mayes, Greg Wilson, Jon Pipitone, and Michael Hansen for Software Carpentry. It was expanded and maintained by many members of the community over almost a decade, to also support Data Carpentry, Library Carpentry, and many other lessons.
In 2022, we adopted a new infrastructure for our lesson sites: The Carpentries Workbench. Lesson sites built on the Workbench are still hosted with GitHub Pages, but no longer use Jekyll. Instead, the lessons are built using a programming language, R, and pandoc, a software designed for converting content between file formats. The Workbench combines three R packages:
- sandpaper: converts a collection of Markdown or RMarkdown files into the structure of a lesson website.
- varnish: provides the files and folders that add styling and additional functionality to a lesson website.
- pegboard: a programmatic interface to the lesson, enabling various automated validation tasks.
For lesson developers, the Workbench makes The Carpentries lesson repositories much simpler to navigate and work with.
Creating a Lesson Repository
To get started, we first need to create a new repository for our lesson. We will use a template to do this, so that the new repository contains the basic files and folders that the Workbench needs in order to build a lesson site. There are currently two templates to choose between:
- A Markdown template
- An RMarkdown template, best suited to lessons you expect to include R source code that will generate output.
One member of each participating lesson team should choose one of these templates, following the link above and completing the configuration as follows:
- add a name for the repository
- The name should be descriptive but fairly brief, with hyphens
(
-
) to separate words - the name can always be changed later, via the repository settings
- The name should be descriptive but fairly brief, with hyphens
(
- in the “Description” field, write the title of your lesson
- choose “Public” visibility
- make sure the “Include all branches” box is checked
After pressing the Create repository using this template button, you should be presented with a brand new lesson repository.
TODO insert screenshot of repository structure here
Remind learners to paste URL of their lesson repository and the rendered version of the lesson to the collaborative document.
Adding collaborators
To be able to add content to the lesson, your collaborators on this project will need access to the repository. To add collaborators to the repository, navigate to Settings, then choose Collaborators from the left sidebar. Now repeat the following steps for every collaborator working with us on the project.
- Click Add people and enter the GitHub username of one of our collaborators.
- Click Add USERNAME to this repository.
Your collaborator should receive an email inviting them to join the repository. After they have accepted this invitation, they should be able to edit the repository, adding new files and modifying existing ones. Only the person who created the repository will be able to adjust the repository settings.
Repository Files
The repository contains a number of files and folders. Most of these are source files for the content of our new lesson, but a few are accompanying files primarily intended for the repository itself rather than the lesson website. These are:
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
CONTRIBUTING.md
LICENSE.md
README.md
.gitignore
- and the
.github/
folder.
We will address all of the files later in the training. For now, we will move on to complete the basic setup of the lesson.
Configuring a Lesson Repository
Activating GitHub Pages
We need to tell GitHub to begin serving the lesson website via GitHub
Pages. To do this, navigate to Settings, then choose
Pages from the left sidebar. Under Source, choose the
gh-pages
branch, leave the folder set to
/ (root)
, and click Save. You may copy the URL in
this box, this will be the address of your lesson site.
Which branch to use?
Although we configure GitHub Pages to serve the lesson website from
the gh-pages
branch, the default working branch for
a lesson will be main
. For the rest of this
training, you should add and edit files on main
, and in
future, when you open Pull Requests to update the lesson content, these
should also be made to main
. The gh-pages
branch should never be modified by anyone other than the automated
actions-user account.
Returning to the repository home page (e.g. by clicking the name of the project near the top left of the window), click the gear wheel icon near the top right, to edit the About box. Check the box that says “Use your GitHub Pages website” to add the address of your lesson site to the About box.
After following these steps, when you navigate to the pages URL, you should be see a lesson website with The Carpentries logo and “Lesson Title” in the top-left corner. You may need to wait a few minutes for the website to be generated.
config.yaml
The lesson title can be adjusted by modifying the
config.yaml
file in the repository. The
config.yaml
file contains several global parameters for a
lesson - to determine some of the page styling, contact details for the
lesson, etc - and is written in YAML, a structured file format of
key-pair values. As well as the title of the lesson, you can and should
adjust some of the other values in config.yaml
, but you
should not need to add new values or learn a lot about YAML to be able
to configure your lesson.
Practice with config.yaml
(5
minutes)
Complete the configuration of your lesson by adjusting the following
fields in config.yaml
:
-
email
: add an email address people can contact with questions about the lesson/project. -
created
: the date the lesson was created (today’s date) in YYYY-MM-DD format. -
keywords
: a (short) list of keywords for the lesson, which can help people find your lesson when searching for resources online. -
source
: change this to the URL for your lesson repository.
We will revisit the life_cycle
and
carpentry
fields in config.yaml
later in this
training.
README.md
The README.md file is the “front page” of your lesson repository on GitHub, and is written in Markdown. You should use it to provide basic information about the project, for anyone who finds their way to the source files for your lesson.
We will revisit README.md
later in the training with
more details on what to include in this file.
Adding Lesson Content
Now that we have completed the basic configuration of a lesson site, it is time to move on and look at where the actual lesson content will be written.
Lesson Home Page
The “home page” of a lesson is created from the index.md
file: this file should contain a brief introduction to the lesson,
designed to give visitors to the page a first impression of the lesson
and whether it is appropriate for them. The file begins with a short
header, written in the same key-value pair syntax we encountered in
config.yaml
.
MARKDOWN
---
site: sandpaper::sandpaper_site
---
This header configures how the site will be built by
sandpaper
, one of the components of The Carpentries
Workbench, and should be left untouched. The page content begins after
the blank line that follows this header.
To get started on this home page, replace the template text with the
same title and short description you added to your
README.md
.
Below those, you can add the prerequisite skills you determined
earlier for your lesson, as a bullet point list to
index.md
:
MARKDOWN
- prerequisite 1
- prerequisite 2
- ...
Episodes
The main body of the lesson is written in episodes: the
individual chunks or sections that the lesson is separated into. The
episode pages of the lesson site will be constructed from Markdown files
in the episodes
folder of the lesson repository.
The episodes
folder of the new repository contains a
single file, introduction.md
. The content of this file
includes examples of how to write Markdown files for The Carpentries
Workbench.
There are two important things to note:
- Like
index.md
, the episode file begins with a short header. The fields in this header describe the episode title and the estimated time (in minutes) required to teach it and complete the exercises. - The example content includes several lines that start with strings
of colons (
:::::::
). These mark the beginnings and ends of structural elements within the page, called fenced divs. Each fenced div starts and ends with a string of colons. A word at the end of the starting colons indicates what kind of block it is. We will explore them in more detail later in the training.
Creating a new episode
Let’s create a new episode file, for one of the episodes you have
just identified. First, open the “raw” view of the
introduction.md
example episode, and copy the first 19
lines, down to the blank line under the closing string of the
objectives
div.
MARKDOWN
---
title: "Using Markdown"
teaching: 10
exercises: 2
---
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: questions
- How do you write a lesson using Markdown and `{sandpaper}`?
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: objectives
- Explain how to use markdown with The Carpentries Workbench
- Demonstrate how to include pieces of code, figures, and nested challenge blocks
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Be careful here to ensure that participants who are collaborating on the same repository do not create conflicts e.g. by editing the same file or creating files with identical names.
Now create a new file in the episodes
folder and, based
on the episodes you planned out in Defining lesson objectives,
choose a name for it that concisely describes the intended content,
e.g. data-visualisation.md
.
For page content, paste those first 19 lines of the
introduction.md
file and:
- replace the title
- set the
teaching
andexercises
fields to zero for now - replace the contents of the
questions
andobjectives
divs with “- TODO”
MARKDOWN
---
title: "Episode Title"
teaching: 0
exercises: 0
---
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: questions
- TODO
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: objectives
- TODO
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Adding a new episode to the lesson navigation
A few minutes after the new file has been created, a new episode page
should become available on your lesson site. To check, navigate with
your web browser to
https://username.github.io/lesson-name/episode-name.html
,
where https://username.github.io/lesson-name/
is the URL of
your lesson homepage, and episode-name
is the name of the
new episode file you created (without the .md
or
.Rmd
extension).
However, this new episode will not yet appear in the navigation of
your lesson site. To enable this, we need to specify where the episode
should appear in the order of the lesson. That episode order is defined
in the episodes
field of the config.yaml
file:
YAML
# Order of episodes in your lesson
episodes:
- introduction.md
Add the name of the new episode file you created to this list in
config.yaml
and commit this change, for example:
YAML
# Order of episodes in your lesson
episodes:
- introduction.md
- data-visualisation.md
After the lesson site has been rebuilt on GitHub, you should see the episode title appear under Chapters in the left sidebar navigation of your lesson site after refreshing the webpage Clicking on that title will take you to the episode page built from the file you created. At the top of the page body, you will find the episode title and an Overview box containing a list of the questions and objectives defined for the episode. Later, we will add more content to your chosen episodes.
TODO add a labelled screenshot of a new episode page
Exercise: practice creating episodes (10 minutes)
Repeat the steps you just saw, to create another new episode file and add it to the lesson site navigation. If you know what another episode in your lesson will be about, create the page for that. Otherwise, feel free to use any values you like for the file name and episode title.
Using this approach, we can build up our lesson one episode at a time.
We have now learned everything we need to be able to use The Carpentries Workbench, and our focus can return to the process of developing a new lesson.
Keypoints
- Lesson sites are built from source repositories with GitHub Pages.
- A new lesson repository can be created from a template maintained by
The Carpentries, and configured by adjusting the
config.yaml
file. - The main pages of a lesson website are created from Markdown or
RMarkdown files in the
episodes
folder.
Content from Break
Last updated on 2022-02-01 | Edit this page
Estimated time 0 minutes
Take a break. If you can, move around and look at something away from your screen to give your eyes a rest.
Content from Defining Episode Objectives
Last updated on 2022-11-10 | Edit this page
Estimated time 35 minutes
Overview
Questions
- How should objectives be written for a smaller part of a whole lesson?
- How are objectives added to an episode page?
Objectives
- Define learning objectives for a section of a lesson.
- Format objectives in the individual pages of a lesson website.
In Defining Lesson Objectives, you created a list of the learning objectives for your lesson as a whole. This process is helpful as a way to set the end goal and, coupled with the expected prior knowledge of the target audience you identified, describe the scope of the lesson.
We can use the same approach for the individual episodes of a lesson, defining objectives for the episode to make clear what we intend to teach in that section. Defining these objectives before writing the episode content helps us to:
- stay focused in the episode, without spending time on non-essential topics
- determine whether learners are attaining the skills we wish to teach them (we will discuss this more in the next two episodes)
- summarise the skills the learner can expect to gain by following this section of the lesson
Exercise: define objectives for your episode (30 minutes)
- Using the same approach as you did for your whole-lesson objectives, define a set of SMART objectives for your chosen episode. (15 minutes)
- Add this list of objectives to replace the
TODO
in theobjectives
fenced div of your episode file (5 minutes) - Compare your list with those created by your collaborators on the
lesson:
- are there any gaps in these objectives, i.e. anything that should be covered in these episodes but is not captured in the objectives?
- are there any overlaps, i.e. anything that looks like it will be covered more than once?
- As a group, discuss how you will address any problems identified in the previous step, and edit your objectives accordingly.
After you have defined the episode objectives, you can add them to
the objectives
div as follows:
MARKDOWN
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: objectives
- objective 1
- objective 2
- ...
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
More Practice with Fenced Divs (optional)
The Carpentries Workbench provides another type of fenced div,
prereq
, that can be used to create a block highlighting the
preprequisites for a lesson.
Use one of these prereq
fenced divs to format the list
of prerequisite skills you added to your index.md
file
earlier.
In index.md
:
MARKDOWN
:::::::::: prereq- prerequisite 1
- prerequisite 2
- ...
:::::::::::::::::
Full List of Fenced Divs
The
Workbench Component Guide provides a full list of all the different
classes of fenced div that can be included using the lesson
infrastructure. The guide specifies which divs are required for an
episode (objectives
, questions
, and
keypoints
), and which are optional.
Now that we have defined objectives for our episodes, we can start working on the next step in developing an effective lesson: designing exercises that will assess whether a learner has learned what you aimed to teach them.
Content from Break
Last updated on 2022-06-10 | Edit this page
Estimated time 0 minutes
Take a break. If you can, move around and look at something away from your screen to give your eyes a rest.
Content from Stay on Target
Last updated on 2022-12-05 | Edit this page
Estimated time 65 minutes
Overview
Questions
- How can you measure learners’ progress towards your lesson objectives?
- Why is it important to identify misconceptions as early as possible?
- Why should we create assessments before we have written the explanatory content of our lesson?
Objectives
- Explain what is meant by the intended and attained curriculum of a lesson.
- Describe the importance of regular assessment while a lesson is being taught.
- Design assessments to identify the misconceptions learners might have during your lesson.
As we have seen previously, defining objectives for a lesson (or a teaching episode) can help to focus your content on the most important learning outcomes and outline the scope of your lesson project. With learning objectives you have defined your intended (or planned) curriculum - what you set out to accomplish with your lesson. The skills and knowledge your learners actually leave with and can demonstrate after the workshop having followed the implemented curriculum in the classroom is called the attained curriculum. Implemented curriculum includes the concepts, relationships and skills that are explicitly covered in your lesson and translated into classroom practices - i.e. the teaching and learning activities that should lead to your learners attaining knowledge.
The goal of the remaining steps of lesson development is to ensure that the attained curriculum matches the intended curriculum as closely as possible. To do so, you need to develop assessments to ensure progression towards your learning outcomes.
Useful reading
Useful further reading: Course design: Considerations for Trainers – a Professional Guide.
Assessments
In order to measure progress and evaluate if and what learning occurred - we use various types of assessments:
- summative assessments - used to verify whether learners achieved the stated learning objectives after instruction.
- formative assessments - used to detect changes in learner performance during instruction, to provide feedback and insight into the learners’ developing mental models of the topic taught and to identify any old or developing misconceptions.
Summative assessments sum up what learning has been achieved after training (e.g. via exams). They give valuable data about learning attainment by individuals and entire cohorts but are not used to guide further progress. They may not be as suitable for short courses, but may be necessary for those that give marks/grades or certificates of completion.
Formative assessments are applied throughout a course and with several different purposes: they provide a way to move new information from working memory to long-term memory; they can inform instructors’ decisions about how to modify instruction to better promote learning; they also inform learners about changes they may need to make to improve their learning. Ideally, they should be used often (e.g. after every 15-20 minutes of teaching), providing opportunities to instructors to change pace and refocus learners’ attention. For short courses, formative assessments are usually more valuable and easier to implement in practice than summative assessments - they need not be complex or time-consuming, just informative enough about learning for both instructors and learners.
The most effective way to test learner understanding is to do such assessments in class - they engage all learners and allow instructors to check learners’ confidence with the content and its delivery, can help you deal with any potential misunderstandings as soon as they arise, and maximise the value of workshop for everyone. Such formative assessments also help with metacognition - the awareness a learner has that they are succeeding in learning something new.
Any instructional tool that generates feedback and is used in a formative way to check for learners’ understanding can be described as “formative assessment”. For example,
- reflection at the end of a session to help process learning - e.g. asking learners to write down things they learned, things they want to know more about and any questions they still have
- concept maps and diagrams - asking learners to reflect by drawing/labeling a concept map/diagram or writing down a list of new concepts and skills they’ve learned and (optionally) how they relate to one another or connect with previous knowledge
- checking in - gauging learners’ satisfaction and understanding using agreed signals (e.g. raising different coloured post-it/sticky notes or Zoom reactions to indicate that the pace is too fast/slow, that they completed/have not completed an exercise).
Many other formative assessment tools can be found in Briggs’ list of “21 ways to check for student understanding” or Edutopia’s “56 Examples of Formative Assessment”.
Exercises are one important type of formative assessment. We will now have a look into exercises that perform misconception checks and ask students diagnostic questions; we will cover a few other types of exercises that help with retaining new knowledge in one of the later episodes.
Detecting Misconceptions
Detecting and correcting misconceptions and fixing learners’ incorrect/broken mental models is as important as presenting your learners with new knowledge and correct information. Why is it important to identify misconceptions as early as possible? When mental models are broken, learning can occur slower than you might expect. The longer a prior incorrect model is in use, and the more extensively it has to be “unlearned”, the more it can actively interfere with the incorporation of the new correct knowledge (since it will contradict the misconceptions already present in the mental model).
Exercise: misconceptions (5 minutes)
What are the common misconceptions learners can have about the topic of your lesson? How might you identify that misconception in your learners while they follow your lesson? Share your answer in the collaborative notes document.
Hint: Try thinking about related or common tools the learners might know and how applying that prior knowledge might lead to a misconception with the topic you are teaching.
Multiple choice question (MCQ) exercises are types of a formative assessment that can help you target anticipated misconceptions. When designed carefully, each incorrect answer in a MCQ will have diagnostic power and provide valuable insight into how a mental model is broken. For example, suppose we are teaching children multi-digit addition. An example of a well-designed MCQ (borrowed from The Carpentries Instructor Training) in this case could be:
Q: What is 27 + 15?
- 42
- 32
- 312
- 33
The correct answer is 42, but each of the other answers provides a valuable insight:
- they do not understand the concept of a carry and are throwing it away completely
- they understand the concept of a carry and know that they cannot just discard the carried ‘1’, but do not understand that it is actually a ten and needs to be added into the next column - they are treating each column of numbers as unconnected to its neighbours.
- they understand that they need to carry ‘1’ but are adding it to the wrong column.
Their diagnostic power means that each of the wrong choices helps an instructor figure out precisely what misconceptions learners had adopted and in which ways their mental models are broken. As a result the instructor may decide to review a particular concept or change the pace of instruction. At the same time, learners get feedback about what they have misunderstood and what they need to focus their study efforts on - we call this guided practice.
When designing a lesson, for diagnostic assessments you can think about problems or questions from previous training events and what people struggled with, or think about your own misconceptions in the past or ask colleagues about their experiences. You should aim to create all your assessments before you have written the explanatory content of your lesson (recall Nicholl’s backward design). These assessments will guide your lesson design process by knowing exactly which knowledge you’d expect from your learners at any point in the lesson.
Exercise: designing a diagnostic exercise (20 minutes)
Create a multiple choice question (MCQ) that could be used in your lesson, to detect the misconception you identified above. As well as the correct answer, include 1-3 answer options that are not obviously incorrect (plausible distractors) and have diagnostic power i.e. each incorrect answer helps you pinpoint the exact misconception carried by the learner.
Share your MCQ in the collaborative notes document.
Exercise: reviewing formative assessments (10 minutes)
(this exercise will only work if participants have sufficient knowledge of their partner’s topic)
The Trainers will group you into pairs.
Review the MCQ designed by your partner. When providing feedback, try to answer the following questions:
- Is the question clear and easy to understand? Could the wording be improved in some way?
- Are the incorrect answers to the MCQ plausible distractors?
- Do the incorrect answers provide diagnostic power, to help an Instructor identify the misconception the learner has?
- Are there any incorrect answers missing i.e. are there other misconceptions that could be detected with this MCQ?
Share your feedback in the collaborative notes document.
Keypoints
- The goal of lesson development is to ensure that the attained curriculum matches the intended curriculum as closely as possible.
- Assessments are a way to determine whether the objectives you defined for the lesson have been reached.
- Formative assessment happens during teaching and provides feedback both to an instructor and a learner - about progress and whether learning of new concepts occurred but also about any misunderstandings and misconceptions which can hinder further learning.
- It is important to detect misconceptions as early as possible and formative assessments (such as multiple choice questions) can help us with this.
Content from Wrap-up
Last updated on 2022-06-10 | Edit this page
Estimated time 15 minutes
Overview
Questions
- What have we learned so far?
Objectives
- Identify some actions that can be taken to build a strong foundation for a lesson.
Up to now, we have focused on some good practices for designing a lesson, and provided opportunities to implement these practices. We also progressed through the first stages of building a lesson website with The Carpentries Workbench.
When we return, we will continue to build on the foundations and complete the initial development of some parts of these new lessons. We will also explore the importance of teaching as an intermediate step in the lesson development process, and discuss how best to prepare to teach new lesson content.
Feedback & questions (5 min)
The Trainer(s) will ask for feedback on the training so far. Take some time to provide this feedback, before moving onto the second part of this task.
In the shared notes document, write down any questions you have after this first part of the training, that you hope will be answered before the end.
Reflection exercise (5 min)
Take some time to think back on what has been covered so far, then make some notes on the most important points and actions you want to take away from that. The Trainers and other participants will not look at this - it is only for you.
If you do not know where to start, consider the following list for a starting point:
- draw a concept map, connecting the material
- draw pictures or a comic depicting one of the concepts covered
- write an outline of the topics we covered
- write a paragraph or “journal” entry about your experience of the training today
- write down one thing that struck you the most
Content from Designing Assessments
Last updated on 2022-12-07 | Edit this page
Estimated time 95 minutes
Overview
Questions
- Why are exercises so important in a lesson?
- What are some different types of exercises, and when should they be used?
- How should exercises be presented in a lesson website?
Objectives
- Choose the format for an exercise based on the outcome it is intended to measure.
- Display exercises and their solutions in a lesson site.
Exercise Your Memory
In a simplified model of memory individuals are equipped with two
types of memory:
working (also called short-term) and long-term. Long-term memory
essentially has unlimited storage but is slow to access, whereas working
memory is quicker to access but can only hold a limited number of items
at a time. For teaching, the goal is to help learners move the new
things they’ve learned from working memory into long-term memory. One of
the ways lesson developers can aid in this process is through exercises.
In addition to providing formative assessments for instructors and check
for misconceptions and broken mental models, exercises help move new
skills and concepts into long-term memory by providing learners an
opportunity to practice what was recently learned. Exercises should
occur frequently throughout the lesson because they move items to
long-term memory and free up learners’ working memory for new items.
Creating exercises builds upon the learning objectives you created earlier in the lesson design process. You can design exercises based on the actions/skills you described in your learning objectives (the learning outcomes you intend for the lesson). This will be easier if your wrote learning objectives with specific action verbs. Specific verbs can help you decide what action you want the learners to perform in the exercise. E.g. actions such as “explain” and “describe” may be better assessed by discussions and multiple choice questions, while “solve,” “construct,” “test” and other higher-level cognitive skills may be better assessed by debugging tasks, code-and-run, or use-in-a-different-context exercises.
Exercise: Exercise Types and When to Use Them (15 minutes)
The Trainers will assign you to pairs or small groups, and give each group an exercise type to focus on. Each group should assign a notetaker, to summarise your discussion at the end of the exercise.
Read about your given exercise type in the Exercise Types chapter of Teaching Tech Together by following the relevant link below.
Then, discuss the following questions together:
- What kind of skills would an exercise of this type assess? Try to identify some action verbs like those we used to write lesson objectives earlier in the workshop.
- Would this type of exercise be suited to a novice audience? Or is it a better fit for intermediate or advanced learners?
- Would this kind of exercise work well in an in-person workshop setting? Would it be better suited to self-directed learning and/or a virtual workshop?
Share the major points of your discussion in the collaborative notes document.
As you discussed with your group in the last exercise, different types of learning objectives work better for novices, while others are a better fit for competent practitioners or experts.
This can be understood in terms of the types of exercises that suit the objective: exercise types that help manage cognitive load for the learner, such as faded examples and Parsons problems (which both provide a lot of the guiding process/scaffolding code and allow the learner to focus on a specific concept or skill) are a good fit for a novice, to whom all elements of the topic are new. However, these kinds of exercise do not provide an opportunity for learners to develop higher-level skills, such as the ability to create whole new functions or scripts, or to extrapolate from the examples they have seen to solve a different kind of problem. Indeed, example and exercise types that are helpful to novices may even be counter-productive for learners with a greater level of expertise.
Thus you want to choose your objectives to fit your intended audience and your exercise formats to fit your objectives.
Testimonial
“Different types of lesson objectives (LOs) are better fit for novices, while others are better fit for competent practitioners, etc. and if exercises (formative assessments) are well aligned to LOs, [they] will automatically serve the corresponding audience. Thinking in terms of LOs (What should a learner do in order to achieve this specific LO? Is this LO exactly what learners are expected to achieve by the end of this piece of instruction? etc.) is easier than thinking in terms of LOs + audience + content. LOs should be tailored to the audience, and, if this is well done, you may stop worrying about the audience. Create LOs for the specific audience and create assessments for specific LOs.”
- Dr. Allegra Via, Carpentries Instructor Trainer
Demo of Writing an Exercise
Well-designed exercises are one of the most valuable resources for an instructor and any time spent on this is well invested.
To create an exercise in The Carpentries Workbench, you can use colon-delimited sections called ‘fenced divs’. In fact, there are many types of boxes in the lesson infrastucture that use fenced divs. In the Workbench, exercises are divided into two categories: discussions (where the main task is for participants to discuss a topic or prompt) and challenges (where the main task is a problem to be solved).
To start a challenge fenced div the line must contain at least 3
colons, then the challenge
tag. Then the content of the
challenge is included on the following lines. Finally, you can close the
fenced div using another line with least 3 colons.
MARKDOWN
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: challenge
### Challenge Title
Challenge text, code, and other information goes here
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
If you also want to include an expandable solution box for the
challenge you can add a solution fenced div within the challenge box.
The format is the same as for a challenge except the tag is
solution
instead. Note the solutions can all be expanded
for more accessible reading using the “Expand All Solutions” option at
the top of each episode.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: challenge
### Challenge Title
Challenge text, code, and other information goes here
:::::::::::::: solution
### Solution Title
Solution text, code, and other information
:::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
For readability, you may want to have the length of the closing lines match the opening lines. See in the above how the challenge and the nested solution’s closing lines are similar lengths to the their corresponding opening lines. For more information about creating exercises see the Workbench Documentation for Exercises.
Some other types of formative assessment include:
- Think, pair, share - learners think about an answer to a question, pair up with a classmate to discuss their answer, and then share out the consensus they came to with the class.
- Sticky/post-it notes and written feedback - learners each get two colors of sticky notes. If they fall behind or run into an issue, they can put up the color that signals they need help. If they have completed and exercise or think the instructor could speed up, they put their other sticky note up. Then at breaks these stickies can turn into written feedback minute cards, where the learner writes down one thing they were confused about or that could be improved and one thing that went well or they really liked learning.
- Reflective assessment - learners spend time reflecting on what they have learned so far. Reflection aids in transferring newly learned concepts into long-term memory and can be really helpful for metacognition, where learners think about the process of learning, becoming aware of their progress towards acquiring new skills. Developing metacognition improves learners’ ability to guide their own learning on a topic after they have finished the lesson. Reflection exercises can include using what was taught to label a diagram, draw a concept map, free write, or fill in a guided worksheet.
Exercise: More Practice with Fenced Divs (10 minutes)
Return to the bulleted list of prerequisite knowledge or skills you
added to the index.md
file of your lesson and use fenced
divs to display it in a formatted box with the prereq
class. Note that all lesson objectives in fenced divs will be combined
into one box at the top of each episode.
Content from Break
Last updated on 2022-06-10 | Edit this page
Estimated time 0 minutes
Take a break. If you can, move around and look at something away from your screen to give your eyes a rest.
Content from Example Data and Narrative
Last updated on 2022-12-07 | Edit this page
Estimated time 65 minutes
Overview
Questions
- Why should a lesson tell a story?
- What considerations are there when choosing an example dataset for a lesson?
- Where can I find openly-licensed, published data to use in a lesson?
Objectives
- Find candidate datasets to use in a lesson.
- Evaluate the suitability of a dataset to be used in a lesson.
- Choose examples that will prepare learners for formative assessments in the lesson.
- Develop a story
Creating a Narrative
Writing your lesson as a story helps learners stay motivated and engaged. The story you create can also help learners more easily connect how the skills they are learning now could be useful after the workshop. You can enable learners to make connections between what they learn in your lesson and their own work by creating a narrative that resembles a situation the learners might encounter there.
You may find that images and figures enhance your narrative. Images are powerful communicators, conveying a lot of information with few or no words. Images can also be distracting for learners. If you choose to include images as part of the narrative of your lesson, be sure that they are consistent with the situation you are describing so that they do not increase learners’ cognitive load.
Depending on the tool you are teaching, you might also include a particular dataset as a part of the story you are weaving into your lesson. It is common for lessons to include a dataset that is used in examples and discussed throughout. This can help you maintain a narrative flow and make the lesson feel more authentic. Even if your topic doesn’t require a dataset, deciding on a consistent narrative will help create a flow between lessons and reduce cognitive load for learners.
Finding Images
Copying an image from a website is technologically simple but can be legally and ethically complex. Images are intellectual property and are subject to intellectual property laws including, but not limited to, copyright and trademark laws. These laws differ by country but are consistent in theme: do not take intellectual property that does not belong to you without permission.
When looking for images that illustrate the narrative of your lesson, avoid copying images that do not include a reuse license. Assume that you cannot reuse these images unless you seek written permission from the image creator or owner. Instead, look for images that indicate that they are in the public domain or carry a permissive reuse license such as CC0 or CC-BY. Public domain images can be freely reused and adapted. Images carrying a reuse license can be used and adapted in accordance with their license terms.
If you cannot find reusable images that match your narrative, you can create your own images or seek help from others in the Carpentries community. When incorporating original images into your lesson, be sure to license these images to be compatible with the license on the rest of your lesson materials.
The guidance in this section is not a substitute for legal advice.
Compatible Licenses
Creative Commons offers a chart that identifies which CC licenses are compatible with each other for adaptation (“remix”) purposes: Creative Commons license comparison chart.
GNU offers commentary about a variety of licenses for free software; this resource may be valuable when considering a license for code: GNU: Various Licenses and Comments about Them
Finding a Dataset
When searching for a dataset to use in your lesson, there are a number of factors to consider. First, if possible you want the dataset to be an authentic use case for researchers in your target audience. This means balancing the size and complexity of a dataset while avoiding additional cognative load for learners. The dataset may need a certain number of observations to demonstrate some of the skills you are teaching or have a number of variables that is sufficiently similar to what learners may encounter in their work to feel authentic. At the same time, you want your learners to be able to interpret the data fairly easily during the lesson so they can focus on the skills you are teaching. This may mean you will need to subset your dataset or remove variables observed.
You may also want to include and review a data dictionary in your lesson, explicitly taking the time to review the information included in the dataset. For inspiration, see the Social Sciences Data Carpentry data dictionary. An additional factor to consider when choosing a dataset to include is the license. You want to find a dataset where the data provider allows for you to freely use it. The best option is a dataset with a CC0 (Public Domain Dedication) license, as other licenses may have more ambiguity around data reuse. Lessons included in The Carpentries Incubator are encouraged to use CC0 licensed data, and may be required to do so to qualify for peer review in The Carpentries Lab. Even with a CC0 license, you will still want to follow best practice in giving attribution to the data provider or collecting agency.
More CC0 License Reading
If you’d like to read more about CC0 and CC-BY, Katie Fortney wrote an excellent blogpost on why CC-BY is not always a good fit.
An example dataset used in the Data Carpentry Ecology lessons is the Portal Project Teaching Database. This dataset is an actual ecological research project that was simplified for teaching. The reuse of this dataset throughout the Data Carpentry Ecology lessons helps stitch together the process of data analysis throughout the workshop, from data entry and cleaning to analysis and visualization.
When deciding on a dataset, it is also important to consider the ethical use of each dataset considered. Does the data contain personally identifiable information? Was the data collected without permission from the groups or individuals included? Will the data be upsetting to learners in the workshop? If the answer to any of these questions might be yes, you will need to do more research on it and continue to look for other options. Commonly data is misused from historically excluded and exploited groups. The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, and Ethics) are good starting point for thinking about data sovereignty and considering the ethics of data collected about an individual or groups of people.
Examples of Public Repositories
When looking for data to reuse, consider public repositories in the subject area for your lesson or general data repositories such as:
- Dryad
- The Data Curation Network’s datasets
- The Offical Portal for European Data
- DataONE
- The Official Portal for Argentina Data (in Spanish)
- LANFRICA
Learners are motivated if you teach most useful things first. As you think about what story your lesson will tell, it is important to put the pieces that are most interesting to learners up front. If they are able to quickly learn tools or skills that they see as useful from your lesson, they will be more interested in continuing to learn other concepts that are needed. You may notice this trend in many of the Software Carpentry lessons. In particular, many of the coding language lessons (R and Python) have the learners create a plot very early in the lesson and then go back and teach coding fundamentals such as loops and conditionals. Visualization of data is often a very motivating and much needed skill by learners. Getting to visualization early, keeps learners interested in learning the additional and vital skills where the application might be less clear.
Exercise: Examples Before Exercises (20 minutes)
Looking back at one of the exercises you designed before: what examples could you include in your narrative to teach learners the skills they will need to apply to complete the formative assessments you have designed?
Examples:
In the Software Carpentry Plotting and Programming with Python Lesson:
Exercise to load and inspect CSV file for Americas -> In the lesson,
the Instructor demonstrates how to load the data table for another
continent (Oceania) and explores the values with a few different
functions. This shows learners how to call the function to load the CSV
into a data frame, and demonstrates what success looks like for this
task. In the Python Interactive Data Visualization Lesson in the
Incubator: Exercise to find the correct widget (a slider) for an action
and modify the script to use it -> In the lesson the instructor
introduces a cheatsheet and documentation for interactive widgets and
then creates a dropdown widget for the application. The slider widget
required in the exercise has not been demonstrated but the preceding
example shows all of the necessary steps to add a widget, and provides
the supporting information that learners can consult to discover how to
implement the specific tool.
Outline one of these examples in your episode file.
Summary
Remember, even if you do not need a dataset for your lesson, you should decide on a narrative. Centering your lesson around a central example reduces the cognitive load of switching between examples throughout the lesson. Using an authentic, yet simple, dataset will also help reduce cognitive load and help learners to see how they might apply what they learned to their own projects. It is also important to consider licensing and ethical considerations when looking for a lesson dataset.
Content from Break
Last updated on 2022-06-10 | Edit this page
Estimated time 0 minutes
Take a break. If you can, move around and look at something away from your screen to give your eyes a rest.
Content from How to Write a Lesson
Last updated on 2022-12-07 | Edit this page
Estimated time 70 minutes
Overview
Questions
- Why do we write explanatory content last?
- How can I avoid demotivating learners?
- How can I prioritise what to keep and what to cut when a lesson is too long?
Objectives
- Estimate the time required to teach a lesson.
- Summarise the content of a lesson as a set of questions and key points.
- Connect the examples and exercises in a lesson with its learning objectives.
Writing Explanatory Text
Explanatory text helps connect your examples and exercises together into a cohesive lesson. If your examples and exercises are train stations and scenic views, the explanatory text is the train tracks that connect them. Often times the examples and exercises may seem like a good draft for you to teach. However, the explanatory text makes it possible for other instructors and self-directed learners to follow along by providing all the relevant information directly in the lesson. It can also help you remember your goals and stay on track teaching.
How much text to include is often a question of personal style while balancing the needs of potential users, both other instructors and learners. You want to find the balance between providing enough information for learners to meet the learning objectives without increasing cognitive load with extraneous information. In this section we will discuss factors to consider when you are writing explanatory text.
There are trade-offs to consider when preparing a site for use as an instructional guide vs use as a self-directed learning resource. Typically, self-directed learning resources are more verbose where instructional guides are aimed at an audience that can fill in the gaps on their own. However, very sparse text is less likely to be re-usable by other instructors as instructors may have different skill levels with the lesson content or differing mental models. In general, it is not a good idea to assume others, learners or instructors, will know what you were thinking when you wrote the content so, if in doubt, be explicit.
Using Callouts
Often lessons have more content than can be reasonably taught in the amount of time allotted. This is especially true for collaboratively developed lessons as each contributor/instructor may have additional items they’d like to see included, leading to “scope creep”.
To address this issue, in many Carpentries lessons, callout boxes are used for asides and short tangents, e.g. points that might be relevant to some audiences but are not essential to the flow of the lesson. These callouts should still be kept to a minimum as they can be disruptive to instructors and readers.
Less is More
Trying to fit too much content into a lesson is counter-productive. It is better to cover less and provide a smaller but stable foundation for learners to build upon.
You should also consider a realistic workshop length for teaching your lesson. It is difficult to keep learners attentive for many hours over many days. Most Carpentries workshops are two work days of lesson material as it is difficult for learners to attend 4 full days of a workshop. Although, there are some in the community who will run workshops that are three days to cover additional material.
As you consider the length of your lesson discuss with your collaborators and ask yourself:
- What is essential to include?
- What can be left out if needed?
- Are there checkpoints where the lesson could end if needed?
- Can important concepts be moved up earlier to ensure they are covered?
In the end, the only way to know for sure is to teach the lesson, measuring how long it takes to teach. Borrowing from television, the Carpentries community calls these early workshops, pilot workshops. As you run pilot workshops, you can note the length of time spent in each episode. You might find the template for notes on pilot workshops helpful as it includes a table for episode and exercise timings. Instructors commonly report running short on time in workshops. Thus, it is better to assume that you are under-estimating rather than over-estimating the length. It is better to have additional time for discussion, review, and wrap-up than to rush through material to fit it into the remaining time.
If, after piloting your new lesson, you find that you did not have time to cover all the content, approach cutting down the lesson by identifying which learning objectives to remove. Then take out the objective(s) and the corresponding assessment(s) and explanatory content. You may consider making a concept map to help identify which objectives depend on one another.
Alternatively, if you decide to keep certain objectives in the lesson, you can add suggestions on which objectives can be skipped to the Instructor Notes for the lesson.
Callout
The Instructor Notes for the whole lesson should be added to the
instructors/instructor-notes.md
file. This page is
displayed in the header menu when in “Instructor View”. You can also add
notes in
a specific episode of the lesson using fenced divs. Instructors can
see the notes within the lesson and the instructor notes tab by changing
the view in the upper right-hand corner of the lesson to “Instructor
View”.
Try out the instructor view by opening this episode seeing the in-line instructor note below.
We will discuss the content of Instructor Notes in more detail later on in section “Preparing to Teach”.
This is the hidden note! Thanks for developing new incubator lessons for others to use!
As you add notes and think about what to cut, remember, reducing the number of lesson objectives can help with managing learner (and instructor) cognitive load.
Testimonial
“the five ways to handle an extraneous overload situation are to:
- eliminate extraneous material (coherence principle),
- insert signals emphasizing the essential material (signaling principle),
- eliminate redundant printed text (redundancy principle),
- place printed text next to corresponding parts of graphics (spatial contiguity principle), and
- eliminate the need to hold essential material in working memory for long periods of time (temporal contiguity principle).”
Other Important Considerations for Lesson Text
When writing your lesson text you also want to avoid unintentionally demotivating your learners. Make time to review your text for:
- dismissive language - e.g. ‘simply’, ‘just’
- use of stereotypes (check learner profiles for stereotypes too)
- expert awareness gaps, i.e. places where you may be assuming the learners know more than they actually do
- fluid representations, i.e. using different terms with the same meaning interchangeably
- unexplained or unnecessary jargon/terminology (as your learners may come from different backgrounds, may be novices, not native English speakers, and a term in one domain/topic may mean something else entirely in another)
- unexplained assumptions
- sudden jumps in difficulty/complexity
You should also review your text thinking about accessibility. This includes:
- Avoiding regional/cultural references and idioms that will not translate across borders/cultures
- Avoiding contractions i.e. don’t, can’t, won’t etc.
- Checking that all figures/images have well written alternative text, including writing altnerative text for data visualizations. An alternative text contains an invisible description of an image which is read aloud to blind users by screen readers providing alternative text-based format for images. See the Workbench documentation for directions on how to add alternative text and captions to images in a lesson
- Checking the header hierarchy - no h1 headers in the lesson body, no skipped levels
- Using descriptive link text - no “click here” or “this page”, etc.
- Checking the text and foreground contrast for images
Optional Exercise: Alternative Text for Images (5 minutes)
Which of the following is a good alt-text option for the image below?

- Graph of data
- Graph with increasing lines
- Line graph of increasing carbon dioxide in ppm at the Mauna Loa Observatory from 1958 to present
- Line graph of increasing carbon dioxide in ppm at the Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, United States, from 1959 to present including values from each year. Red line shows variation in each year and black line is average for each year. 1959 = 315.90 ppm, 1960 = 316.91, 1961 = 317.64 …
Data/Image provided by NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
The third option, “Line graph of increasing carbon dioxide in ppm at the Mauna Loa Observatory from 1958 to present”, is the best option. It describes the type of plot, what is measured, and the trend.
The first two options are too vague. They mention a graph but don’t give enough info to know what the graph is actually showing.
The last option is overly descriptive and starts to list the data itself. It is better to include a shorter, but informative, description and a link to the data instead.
May want to point out that the answers in the current version of this exercise do not have diagnostic power.
Other Text to Complete an Episode
When writing a lesson, you should also consider adding key terms to the lesson glossary for the lesson. Following the instructions on how to create a glossary in the Workbench documentation will help you to create this section of the lesson.
Many of these terms may also be useful for other lessons and can be added to Glosario, a multilingual glossary for computing and data science terms.
In addition to objectives, a completed episode also requires fenced divs for the questions the episode answers and the keypoints a lesson covers. The questions box helps learners understand what to expect from a lesson as they might not yet understand the learning objectives. The keypoints box wraps up the lesson by providing answers to each of the questions. Keypoints also help self-directed learners review what they learned, remind instructors to recap what was covered in an episode, and help you ensure you answered all the questions you intended for an episode.
Exercise: Completing episode metadata (10 minutes)
Add key points and questions to your episode.
To check the formatting requirements, see the Introduction Episode example in your lesson or the Workbench Documentation
Polishing a lesson
Lessons do not need to be perfected prior to teaching them the first time. In fact, keeping things relatively basic leaves you some flexibility while you run through the first few iterations of teaching the lesson, collecting feedback, and using that to guide improvements.
However, once you find that the lesson is beginning to reach something like a stable state, you may find the checklist for lesson reviewers in The Carpentries Lab useful as a guide for polishing the design and content. The checklist describes criteria for a lesson to meet a high standard in terms of its accessibility, design, content, and supporting information.
Reflection Exercise (20 minutes)
Map out the relationships between the lesson objectives (LO), the
learning experiences via which they will be delivered and those specific
items of content e.g., item A supports LO 1, & will be delivered
using a lecture
OR more specifically
The read CSV and inspect demo supports Objective 2 (Use Pandas to load a
simple CSV data set) and will be delivered using participatory live
coding.
- Is there any piece of content that doesn’t support any learning objectives?
- Is there at least one piece of content for each learning objective?
- Is there at least one learning experience for each piece of content?
What do you still need to add/work on? What can you remove/consider removing? What diagram or other visual aids could you add to supplement your text?
Keypoints
- The objectives and assessments provide a good outline for an episode and then the text fills in the gaps to support anyone learning or teaching from the lesson.
- It is important to review your lesson for demotivating language, cognitive load, and accessibility.
- To reduce cognitive load and ensure there is enough time for for the materials, consider which lesson objectives are not needed and remove related content and assessments.
Content from Break
Last updated on 2022-06-10 | Edit this page
Estimated time 0 minutes
Take a break. If you can, move around and look at something away from your screen to give your eyes a rest.
Content from How we Operate
Last updated on 2022-12-07 | Edit this page
Estimated time 30 minutes
Overview
Questions
- What does The Carpentries lesson development ecosystem look like?
- What are the important milestones in the development of a new lesson?
- How can The Carpentries lesson development community help me complete my lesson?
Objectives
- Describe the life cycle of a lesson.
- Summarise the path a new lesson can take through The Carpentries Incubator and Lab.
- Connect with other members of the community.
Until now, this training has focused on the internals of a lesson development project. Now it is time to consider the context in which this lesson development can take place.
The Carpentries Lesson Development Ecosystem
The Carpentries Incubator is a space for The Carpentries community to collaborate on lessons. It provides a single location where our community can come to find lessons that are being developed by the community, and to create new lessons using The Carpentries Workbench. Community members retain ownership of their lessons hosted in the Incubator, while benefiting from the increased findability it gives to the lesson.
The Carpentries supports the lesson developer community working in the Incubator with training (like this one), communications designed to raise awareness of lesson projects within the community, and platforms for the community to discuss and collaborate on lesson development.
The Carpentries also provides a space for community-developed lessons to reside after the initial phases of development have been completed. The Carpentries Lab provides a platform for open peer-review of lessons, and hosts the collection of lessons that have passed through this review process. These peer-reviewed lessons can be considered ready to teach by any Instructor with sufficient knowledge of the topic. In the future, this lesson review process may also be used to determine when a lesson in the Incubator is ready to be incorporated into one of The Carpentries Lesson Programs, the collection of lessons and curricula that can be taught in an official workshop for Software, Library, or Data Carpentry.
The Lesson Life Cycle
To make it easier for other community members to assess the current state of a lesson in the Incubator, The Carpentries encourages lesson developers to indicate the status of their lesson by labelling its progress through a lesson life cycle:

Each life cycle stage indicates the level of maturity of a lesson:
- pre-alpha: a first draft of the lesson is still being constructed.
- alpha: the lesson has been/is being taught by the original authors, but has not been fully tested.
- beta: the lesson is ready to be taught by instructors who have not been significantly involved in its developed to this point.
- stable: the lesson has been extensively tested by the authors and others. It can be considered broadly complete and unlikely to undergo any drastic changes without warning.
The life cycle stage of a lesson is displayed as a banner on the lesson site, as a label on the lesson GitHub repository, and alongside the lesson whenever it is shown on The Carpentries websites and lesson listings.
The life cycle stage for a lesson is configured in the
config.yaml
file we encountered when we were first
introduced to The Carpentries
Workbench, as a value for the life_cycle
field. For new
lesson repositories, this value is already set to ‘pre-alpha’, so you
should not have to change it yet.
The carpentry
Field
The config.yaml
file also contains a
carpentry
field, which can be used to adjust the styling
applied to a lesson website e.g. to make it look like a lesson from the
Software, Library, or Data Carpentry Lesson Programs.
For community-developed lessons, where no official relationship
exists with one of these Lesson Programs, you should keep using the
incubator
setting, before potentially switching over to
another styling when the lesson moves e.g. into The Carpentries Lab.
Pilot Workshops
In line with the importance we placed on evaluation of lesson content earlier in this training, the life cycle described above places considerable emphasis on the testing of lessons in pilot workshops.
For these pilot workshops to provide an effective evaluation of the lesson, it is essential to seize the opportunity they provide to collect feedback and data. For example, a pilot workshop offers a chance to answer questions like:
- How much time does it take to teach each section of the lesson?
- How much time is required for each exercise?
- What technical issues were encountered during the lesson?
- What questions did learners ask during the workshop?
- Which parts of the lesson were confusing for learners?
- Which exercises could be improved to provide more information to the instructors?
The pilot workshop notes template provides a starting point, but it takes a lot of time and effort to keep track of all this information during a pilot workshop. It can be helpful to assign this task to a member of the lesson development team, who can dedicate themselves to observing the pilot and taking notes. As soon as the pilot has finished, it is a good idea to take some time to share the notes with the other lesson authors, to reflect on and discuss the experience of teaching the lesson, and to synthesise the lesson notes and any action items that come from this debrief into specific action items to improve the lesson. These should be added as new issues on the lesson repository, to help you keep track of the work that needs doing for the next iteration.
For beta pilot workshops, where the lesson is taught by instructors who have not yet made a major contribution to its development, it is vital that instructors have the opportunity before the workshop to learn about the lesson from the authors, and to debrief with the authors afterwards so that they can share their experience and observations about how the lesson could be further improved.
Hosting and Teaching Pilot Workshops
The Carpentries community handbook includes guidance for community members who want to teach and/or host pilot workshops.
Connecting with the Lesson Developer Community
With over 100 lessons under development in The Carpentries Incubator, the lesson developer community is thriving. Connecting with this community can be a great way to find collaborators to contribute to or test your lesson, to stay up to date with the latest support provided to the community, and to learn from the experience of others.
Here are a community activities and channels that you might be interested in joining:
- The
lesson-dev
channel on The Carpentries Slack workspace. This is a platform for the community to ask questions and make announcements about lesson development. You could also browse the other channels on the workspace for any that are relevant to the topic of your lesson.- You may also find it helpful to create a new channel on Slack for discussion of your lesson. Chat channels like this can be valuable ways for a remote team to communicate and collaborate.
-
The
incubator-developers
list on TopicBox. The Carpentries Curriculum Team uses this mailing list to make relevant announcements to the community of lesson developers working in Incubator. - The Carpentries Curriculum Team hosts monthly Lesson Development Coworking Sessions, which are a good opportunity to engage with other lesson developers and make regular progress on your project. The sessions are listed on The Carpentries community calendar.
Keypoints
- New lessons are developed in The Carpentries Incubator and reviewed in The Carpentries Lab.
- Teaching a lesson for the first time is an essential intermediate step in the lesson development process.
- The Carpentries lesson developer community shares their experience on multiple communication channels.
Content from Preparing to Teach
Last updated on 2022-12-09 | Edit this page
Estimated time 65 minutes
Overview
Questions
- What can I do to prepare to teach my lesson for the first time?
- How should I communicate lesson setup instructions to learners?
- What information should be recorded for instructors teaching a lesson?
- How should information be collected as part of the feedback process?
Objectives
- Summarise lesson content as a teaching plan.
- Add Setup Instructions and Instructor Notes to the lesson site.
- Create a feedback collection plan.
By now you should have developed objectives, exercises/formative assessments, and examples for at least one of the episodes in your lesson. In order to prepare to teach it (for the first time in particular) you’ll need to create a teaching plan and design a method to collect feedback on your lesson.
Teaching Plan
A teaching plan outlines the structure of your teaching session, including details, estimated duration and materials needed to deliver it. For example, a teaching plan may contain the following:
- welcome, introductions and motivation for the lesson - to introduce yourself, aims and objectives of the lesson and how it will help learners
- setup - to check if everyone is ready to proceed with the lesson
- segments of teaching and exercises from the lesson and any other planned activities (e.g. group discussions, wrap-up and feedback)
- checkpoints - places where you have planned to stop to check-in with learners
- slides, figures and other visual aids needed to deliver teaching and other parts of the teaching plan
- resources/references/recommended reading
Checkpoints in a Teaching Plan
Checkpoints are especially useful at the beginning of a lesson when you may not have as many exercises but the learners need to have the data downloaded or tool opened to be able to follow along. A checkpoint could include stopping to ask what questions learners have or having them indicate if they have completed the most recent step shown by the instructor.
Perspective on Preparing a Teaching Plan
“I usually create detailed notes organised in a concept map/workflow in order to make everything consistent. I also write next to each bit of teaching the time approximately needed. For each lesson I create (and reuse when I teach again the same lesson) very detailed notes of what happens during the lesson, including teaching goals and learning objectives I mean to achieve with each bit of lesson. This rich lesson plan requires a lot of work the first time I teach a lesson, but reduces a lot the preparation time of future lessons and are super useful to other teachers.”
- Dr. Allegra Via, Carpentries Instructor and Instructor Trainer
Figures and other visual aids are great tools to help participants understand the content being presented and make associations between pieces of information. If you are planning on using these in your teaching session/pilot - remember to enhance them with the alternative text (alt) describing the figure for individuals using screen readers or by placing explanatory text adjacent to relevant parts of visualisation.
If your lesson requires participants to use any software, tools or
data - it is worthwhile investing time now into creating clear download,
installation and setup instructions for participants to follow and
circulating them ahead of the workshop. This will give you more time at
the pilot for teaching the lesson as troubleshooting setup problems on
the spot can be time-consuming and stressful. Each Carpentries lesson
has a dedicated place for setup instructions within The Carpentries
Workbench located in the file learners/setup.md
off the
lesson project root.
Another standard piece of The Carpentries Workbench are the
Instructor Notes pages - intended to help you and other
instructors deliver your lesson by providing useful tips for how to best
run a workshop or explain “sticky” points in the lesson. Instructor
Notes for your lesson are located in the
instructors/instructor-notes.md
file off your lesson
project root where you may consider adding the following
information:
- rationale, strengths and/or weaknesses of the lesson design
- what has been tried before and what worked/did not work
- tips for teaching the lesson/particular episodes
- challenges encountered
- troubleshooting common setup/installation/exercise issues
- parts that seem to cause trouble or most confusion for learners (i.e. where to tread carefully, spend more time explaining)
It may initially be difficult to create Instructor Notes until you have taught the lesson yourself for the first time - but after the first pilot you will have enough feedback to draft them.
Feedback Collection Plan
There is a lot to collect feedback on when trialling a new lesson and this is arguably the most important part of your teaching plan. It can be hard to capture all this information yourself while you are teaching, hence you will need help from your team - make sure you assign the feedback collection roles ahead of your pilot. Additionally, when you are advertising your workshop, try and make it clear to the participants you are piloting a new lesson and that they will be actively helping you refine it as well as learning new things themselves. This can help focus their attention on the feedback you need to collect from them, which you should be doing:
-
constantly and throughout the workshop
- As notes taken by an observer/co-instructor - refer to the “Pilot Workshops” episode for suggestions on things to track and the pilot workshop notes template and other suggested feedback collection mechanisms to help you gather such information.
- As “minute card” feedback from learners - minute cards are short comments from learners on what is working well and what could be improved, provided frequently (e.g. at the end of each session). Like exercises used as formative assessment, minute card feedback can be provided by learners while there is still time for instructors to act on it and adjust their approach. You may find the Virtual Minute Card template helpful for workshops run online, and the Instructor Training curriculum describes how sticky notes can be used at in-person events.
- at a designated wrap-up and feedback session at the end of the workshop. Here, you can cover any other feedback that was not addressed up to that point and any specific questions you may want to ask your audience (e.g. about the choice of topics for the lesson, difficulty level, workshop operations). You may design a special form that participants can fill in anonymously - here is a post-workshop survey template for workshops that pilot a lesson in The Carpentries Incubator. You can use it as a starting point for a post-workshop survey to be shared with your learners at the end of the pilot workshop and you can supplement it with additional questions.
Exercise: homework
The final part of this training will focus on the skills needed to collaborate effectively. Before that there will be a break, during which we would like you to complete the following three tasks:
- Teach one episode of your lesson (probably the one you have been working on in these two days). See the Lesson Trial Runs page for full details.
- After your trial run has concluded (immediately after, or when you
have reviewed any feedback you collected from learners), note down your
answers to the following questions:
- What worked?
- What did not?
- What will you do differently next time?
- What will you change in your material you taught? We will refer to these notes when we reconvene for the last episode of this training.
- Based on your experience teaching the material and the feedback you
received from your learners and helpers, make a list of issues you have
identified with the material you prepared, e.g.:
- examples that did not work as expected,
- improvements that could be made to exercises,
- parts that learners found particularly challenging,
- unexpected questions or misconceptions that came up during the trial run.
What questions do you have? (15 minutes)
The homework from this workshop includes a trial run of one of the episodes you have been developing in your lesson, to a real audience.
After reading the information provided about the trial run task and thinking about this task, what questions do you have about how you should approach teaching that trial run? Is there anything you are unsure of? What resources might help you prepare for that experience?
Keypoints
- Spending time on preparing your teaching and feedback collection will make you and your participants get the most out of your workshop pilot.
- Creating clear setup instructions as part of your lesson and circulating them ahead of the pilot is time well-invested and will give you more time when teaching the lesson.
- Instructor Notes are teaching tips that you should include with your lesson to help you (a few months down the line) and other instructors, who have the relevant topic knowledge but have not been involved in the lesson design and development, deliver your lesson more successfully.
Content from Wrap-up
Last updated on 2022-06-10 | Edit this page
Estimated time 30 minutes
Overview
Questions
- What have we learned so far?
- What needs to be done before the next part of the training?
Objectives
- Summarise the lesson development process introduced in this training.
- Describe the trial run task to be completed before the next part of the training
- Identify remaining tasks that should be completed before trialling lesson content.
Recent sections of this training have focused on how to design effective assessments and write a lesson that will be engaging and motivating for learners. We provided further opportunities to apply these concepts to the development of a lesson website with The Carpentries Workbench. Next, we explored The Carpentries lesson development ecosystem and how a new lesson project can fit into that. We finished up with a discussion of the importance of teaching a new lesson and how best to prepare for that experience.
The final sessions will focus on collaboration skills, exploring how trainees can curate their repository and manage their project to foster collaboration and build community around a lesson.
Before that, there will be an extended break during which trainees should conduct a trial run of the lesson content they have been developing in the workshop so far. When the training recommences, there will be an opportunity for trainees to share their experiences and reflections from those trial runs, and to discuss what impact that will have on the next stages of their lesson development.
Please provide another round of feedback and spend some time reflecting.
Organise Your Knowledge (10-15 min)
Take some time to think back on what has been covered so far, then make some notes on the most important points and actions you want to take away from that. The Trainers and other participants will not look at this - it is only for you.
If you do not know where to start, consider the following list for a starting point:
- draw a concept map, connecting the material
- draw pictures or a comic depicting one or more of the concepts
- write an outline of the topics we covered
- write a paragraph or “journal” entry about your experience of the training today
- write down one thing that struck you the most
Please stay in touch as you plan for your trial run.
Keypoints
- We have learned about the importance of exercises and data in a lesson, the ecosystem The Carpentries provides for lesson development, and how to prepare to teach a lesson for the first time.
- Before the next part of the training, you should teach a part of your new lesson to a real audience and reflect on the experience.
Content from Reflecting on Trial Runs
Last updated on 2023-03-22 | Edit this page
Estimated time 55 minutes
Overview
Questions
- What did I learn when I taught my lesson?
Objectives
- Reflect on the experience of teaching part of a lesson for the first time.
- Identify changes and improvements that can be made as a result of trialling lesson material.
Welcome back! In this section of the training, we will learn more about the skills and tools you can use to become an effective collaborator on an open source lesson. Before moving on to cover that, we will spend some time reflecting on and discussing the experience of teaching new lesson material for the first time.
In the break since last time, you should have trialled part of the lesson you set out to develop in this training. Congratulations on organising and delivering your first pilot! We will use this session to reflect on that experience, and take some steps to ensure that the feedback and notes you gathered during the trial run are used to improve the quality of your lesson.
Discussion: trial runs (35 minutes)
Look back at the notes you took and feedback you received during your trial run (5 mins).
Now report out to the other participants about that trial run. Try to answer some or all of the following questions:
- What worked well both in terms of content and delivery?
- What did not work as well?
- How close were your time estimates to the actual time needed to teach the material and finish exercises?
- How did the audience perceive the difficulty level of the material?
- What will you do differently next time?
- What will you change in the material you taught?
- What will you change in the way you collect feedback in future pilots?
Moving forward from your first pilot, the next steps to consider are:
- Record all the identified changes and improvements that can be made
to the lesson material and assign a person from the team responsible for
each task. The above exercise provided some reflection points after a
trial run; in terms of lesson content, they may translate into the
following considerations:
- is the material too dense, does it need extra explanations?
- would adding a diagram help explain or curate things better?
- is there too much content for one episode, and do you need to split it into smaller teaching units?
- do you need to re-organise and move some content around to improve the flow and narrative?
- are there enough exercises and practical work?
- do you need to realign your lesson objectives and key messages?
- Decide if for some of the feedback you will not take action. Remember, you do not need to respond to every piece of feedback you receive. For example, it is easy to fall down the rabbit hole of adding extra material just because someone suggested it may be a useful thing - sometimes, adding a link or a callout to extra reading is sufficient. You need to be able to draw a line under any extra modification suggestions to keep you in scope and on schedule.
- Schedule follow-up co-working sessions with your team to carry on working on fixing issues and adding new content to maintain the momentum.
- Add/Update your lessons’ Instructor Notes based on what you learned and to help other instructors who will teach your lesson in the future.
- Think about the timeline for your next pilot(s), even provisionally, to help you set milestones and targets to work towards.
- Consider writing up your pilot experience in a mini blog post that you can share with the community.
Designing and developing quality lessons is hard - there are many pieces of a puzzle that have to come into place: both pedagogical and organisational. Do not be disheartened with the amount and type of feedback you may have received. Even Carpentries lessons that have been around for 10+ years receive improvement suggestions and fixes almost daily. From our experience, bigger lessons that are delivered over a few days require several full pilots before they can even be considered for a beta release. Planning smaller lesson trials (where you test only a portion of a lesson) and doing them more often with a friendly audience from your local groups and close colleagues is more manageable and will help you make steady progress.
Keypoints
- “Perfect is the enemy of good” - your lesson does not need to be perfect before you pilot or release it for community review. Early feedback from the target audience will help you avoid straying off your lesson plan.
- Identify changes and improvements you want to make as a result of trialling your lesson and schedule co-working sessions to work on these tasks.
Content from Break
Last updated on 2022-06-10 | Edit this page
Estimated time 0 minutes
Take a break. If you can, move around and look at something away from your screen to give your eyes a rest.
Content from Collaborating with Your Team
Last updated on 2023-03-22 | Edit this page
Estimated time 105 minutes
Overview
Questions
- How can I use GitHub to manage a lesson development project?
- What communication channels are effective for a lesson development team?
- What strategies exist to help collaborators make decisions and govern an open source project?
Objectives
- Report and track issues with the GitHub interface.
- Review and provide feedback on contributions from collaborators.
- Prepare for a decision-making meeting between collaborators.
In this episode we expand on how to use GitHub effectively among a group of known collaborators on an open source lesson development project, setting the stage for introducing tools and practices for working with newcomers. Here, we explore GitHub features to help you keep track of what needs doing on the lesson, making decisions and managing your project. Collaboration skills covered in this lesson are transferable to any similar open source project you may be involved with.
Managing Issues
Issues are GitHub’s framework for managing issue/bug reports, feature requests, and lists of future work. They provide a single shared record of all the problems people have found with the lesson, and improvements that could be made, along with solutions and discussions around them. This helps the team to keep track of what they need to work on later, and reduces the chance of receiving redundant reports of issues you already know about.
When you create an issue, you can add a range of details to it. An issue can be assigned to a specific team member - this can be a helpful way to know who is currently working to fix an issue or a way to assign responsibility to someone to deal with it. You can assign one or more labels to issues to classify or group them. Labels can also be given colours, allowing you to see at a glance from the Issues page the state of your project. The default labels available in GitHub include:
-
bug
- indicates an unexpected problem or unintended behavior -
documentation
- indicates a need for improvements or additions to documentation -
duplicate
- indicates similar or already reported issues, pull requests, or discussions -
enhancement
- indicates new feature requests, or if they are created by a lesson maintainer, indicate planned new features -
good first issue
- indicates a good issue for first-time contributors -
help wanted
- indicates that a maintainer wants help on an issue or pull request -
invalid
- indicates that an issue, pull request, or discussion is no longer relevant -
question
- indicates that an issue, pull request, or discussion needs more information -
wontfix
- indicates that work won’t continue on an issue, pull request, or discussion
Check the GitHub
documentaiton on Issues for the full reference. You can also create
your own custom labels to help with classifying issues. There are no
rules really about naming the labels - use whatever makes sense for your
project. Some conventional custom labels include:
status:in progress
(to indicate that someone started
working on the issue), status:blocked
(to indicate that the
progress on addressing the issue is blocked by another issue or
activity), etc.
Exercise: creating issues (15 minutes)
After your trial run, you should have created a list of issues you identified with your lesson. Open issues on the GitHub repository for your lesson, for each item on that list. Remember to add labels to each issue according to its type, priority, etc. As you create them, you may also want to assign these issues to a member of your lesson development team.
Managing Contributions - Pull Requests
Although it is possible (for collaborators with sufficient access to
the project) to make changes to a lesson directly on the
main
branch of the repository, doing so is not
recommended:
- It increases the likelihood of unintentional conflicts being created when two collaborators work on the same file simultaneously.
- It does not provide an opportunity for changes to be checked and discussed before they are included in the lesson. This makes it much more likely that mistakes will be included in the lesson, and that the commit history of the project will include many changes made only to fix/polish/undo previous commits.
- It prevents your team from benefiting from the powerful features that Git and GitHub provide to support and foster collaboration.
Instead, it is recommended practice to do most work in
branches: sets of changes that build on the work in the
main
branch (or another) but are not included in that
branch until they are explicitly merged into it. GitHub
provides a way for this merging process to be managed, by giving a
platform for the changes to be described, discussed and reviewed, before
a decision is made to integrate or not integrate the changes in the
default branch of the project and the associated lesson.
On GitHub, these units of discussion, review, and acceptance/rejection of the changes within a branch are called Pull Requests.
Why “Pull Request”?
The term Pull Request originates from the early days of GitHub, when a contributor would be requesting that the project maintainer(s) use Git to fetch (download) their branch and merge the changes into the main branch of the project. In the terminlogy of Git, this combination of fetching and merging a set of changes is called pulling. The name Pull Request is slightly anachronistic now, because a project maintainer can often manage the whole process of reviewing a contribution in GitHub’s web interface.
Note: A common nickname for a Pull Request is PR or PRs for Pull Requests.
Protecting main
When preparing to teach this section, you should check that you have admin privileges on your example repository.
As the maintainer of a project, you can enforce this workflow by protecting the default branch of the GitHub repository: this will prevent anyone without Admin access from committing changes directly to that branch.
To activate this branch protection:
- Open the Settings tab of the repository and select Branches in the left sidebar, under the Code and automation section.
- Click the “Add branch protection rule” button.
- Type the name of the branch your GitHub Pages are being built from
(
main
) into the “Branch name pattern” box. - Check the “Require a pull request before merging” option, but leave the others unchecked for now because we don’t need them for this project.
Submitting and Reviewing Pull Requests
The Trainers will collaborate on a demonstration of the process laid out below.
Pull Request Activity
Note: This activity is designed to be carried out by two Trainers acting in two different roles: “(S)” denotes the Pull Request Submitter role, “(R)” the Pull Request Reviewer.
- (S) Explore list of issues on repository, choose issue to fix, make note of issue number.
- (S) Edit a file to fix the issue, commit changes to a new branch with an appropriate name. Ensure that the changes include some typo etc that the Reviewer will be able to comment on and/or suggest a fix/improvement to.
- (S) Show how to open a pull request from that new branch to
main
. - (S) In Pull Request description, reference the number of the issue being fixed, using a keyword “Fixes #X” or “Resolves #X” (where X is the issue number) to ensure automatic closure.
- (S) Demonstrate how to mark the PR as a draft, and then how to mark as it as ready for review.
- (S) Request a review from the Pull Request Reviewer.
- (R) Open the new Pull Request in GitHub.
- (R) Explore the diff of the PR, by opening the Files changed tab and talking through the display.
- (R) Comment on a line in the diff.
- (R) Suggest a change to the diff, using the “Add suggestion” button
or three backticks marked
suggestion
. - (R) Complete your review by adding some summary text and selecting “Request changes”.
- (R) Return to Conversation tab, to show how the PR thread looks after the review has been submitted.
- (S) Navigate to PR and the Files changed tab.
- (S) Respond to Reviewer’s comment(s), accept their suggested changes (draw attention to the option to batch multiple suggestions into a single commit).
- (S) Return to the Conversation tab and request a new review from the Reviewer.
- (R) Look again at the PR diff (Files changed) and ensure that requested changes have been made.
- (R) Approve the PR.
- (R) Thank the Submitter for their contribution.
- (R) Merge the PR.
- (R) Navigate to issue listing to confirm that the relevant issue has been automatically closed.
Practice with Pull Requests (15 minutes)
In breakout groups, assign yourselves the role of Submitter (S) and Reviewer (R), and repeat the process described above by completing the steps below. If there are any issues open on the repository that can be solved very quickly, feel free to address those with this exercise. Otherwise, the Submitter can open a Pull Request to make simple changes: typo fixes, or some completely arbitrary changes to a file. If the changes made for the exercise are not improvements to the lesson, the Reviewer should follow all the steps but close the PR at the end instead of merging it.
- (S) Edit a file and commit the changes to a new branch.
- (S) Open a new Pull Request from this new branch to
main
. If your PR will fix an open issue on your repository, include “Fixes #X” at the start of the PR description, where X is the issue number. - (S) Request a review from the Reviewer.
- (R) Review the PR, making comments and suggesting changes as appropriate. When you have finished, approve the PR or request changes, based on your review.
- (S) Respond to any comments from the Reviewer and/or, if any changes were requested, make those and re-request a review when you have finished.
- (R) When all changes have been made to your satisfaction, approve the PR, thank the Submitter for their contribution, and merge the PR (Or close it if the changes were made for practice but should not be included in the actual lesson.)
Managing Communication
Having an open, publicly-visible list of all the issues with your project is a helpful way of letting people know you are aware of issues and you are working on them. This can indicate to an external audience that the project is active. It also provides you and your collaborators with an “at a glance” view of the state of the project, making it easier to prioritise future work.
As we have seen in the previous episode, GitHub’s notifications framework Mentions plays an important part in communicating between collaborators and is used as a way of alerting team members of activities and referencing one issue/comment/pull requests from another.
Slack is commonly used in the Carpentries community for quick, day-to-day message exchange among teams. You can create your own Slack workspace for free or create a channel for your lesson development project under the Carpentries public Slack workspace. Note that the Carpentries Slack is an enterprise workspace so all messages and files will be retained and no messages will be lost (for free workspaces only the most recent 10,000 messages can be viewed and searched and file storage limit is 5 GB).
Collaborators can also use other platforms to discuss lesson development or receive contributions from newcomers who are not yet fluent in using GitHub’s systems of communication. The Carpentries can assist with creating a mailing list specific to the development of your lesson on their TopicBox platform for managing threaded email discussions. Also make sure to join the Incubator lesson developers mailing list on TopicBox to keep an eye on announcements and discussions relating to lesson development in general within the Carpentries community.
Meeting minutes are a useful way of providing a permanent record of the purpose of a meeting and what was talked about, including any decisions made or actions taken, that can be referred back to for any follow-ups. Recording meeting minutes does not have to be hard - remember that you are part of a team and there are many platforms that allow collaborative note taking. The Carpentries provides CodiMD and Etherpad instances as two options for taking shared notes, widely used at workshops for sharing pieces of code, references and notes between instructors and learners. For some advice on holding effective meetings, see the Meetings, meetings, meetings section of Teaching Tech Together by Greg Wilson.
Project planning & management
Developing a lesson is a project and, like most projects, it consists of multiple tasks. Keeping track of the list of tasks the team has to do, progress on each, prioritising tasks for future development, sprints and releases, etc., quickly becomes a non-trivial task in itself. Without a good project management framework, it can be hard to keep track of what’s done, or what needs doing, and particularly difficult to convey that to others in the team or share the responsibilities.
GitHub provides two project management tools for this purpose - Milestones and Project Boards. Both Milestones and Project Boards implement an agile development/project management system to help you keep track of different components of the project and their current status. Milestones are good for scrum-style project development and management - i.e. time-bound, structured iterations and working in short sprints on batches of issues. Project Boards implement a Kanban methodology - good for managing continuous delivery and steady flow of work in a project.
Both Project Boards and Milestones are a way of organising issues into smaller “sub-projects” (i.e. smaller than the “project” represented by the whole repository). When should you use one over the other? Project Boards provide a way of visualising and organising the work on a higher level (e.g. more suitable for project management tasks that are not time-bound). Milestones are a way to organise lower-level tasks that have deadlines and progress of which needs to be closely tracked (e.g. release management). How you organise and partition your project work is up to you and the size of your project. For example, you could create a project per milestone or have several milestones in a single project, and split milestones into shorter sprints.
Milestones
A Milestone is a collection of issues to be worked on in a given time period. Milestones are good for tracking progress as they provide an ordered list of issues which must all be resolved for the overall task to be considered complete. Milestones work like labels - they mark and group issues that are expected to be closed at some point in time.
The Milestones
page in GitHub is accessible from the
Issues
page - from there you can create a new milestone,
see the percentage of issues completed for your milestones and their due
dates. You can also sort milestones by due date and prioritise issues
within a particular milestone. Back on the Issues
page, you
can assign issues to milestones and filter your issues by
milestones.
Project Boards
A Project Board (or Kanban board, from the Japanese word for ‘card’) uses columns and cards to keep track of tasks - you break your project down into tasks which you write on cards, then move the cards between columns that describe the status of each task. Cards are usually small, descriptive and self-contained tasks that build on each other. Breaking a project down into clearly-defined tasks makes it a lot easier to manage and develop. GitHub project boards interact and integrate with the other features of the site such as issues and pull requests - cards can be added to track the progress of such tasks and automatically moved between columns based on their progress or status.
GitHub provides template boards that by default contain the three ‘basic’ columns, with pretty self-explanatory names:
To Do
In Progress
Done
If you add an issue or pull request to a card in the board, it will
automatically be moved to ‘Done’ for you when you close the issue or
merge the pull request. One common extra column is On hold
or Waiting
. If you have tasks that get held up by waiting
on other people (e.g. to respond to your questions) then moving them to
a separate column makes their current state clearer.
You can also create a card without an issue. Such cards (or notes) can have detailed content like checklists or ideas which are not necessarily suitable for inclusion in your issue tracker. However, GitHub also allows you to convert a card to an issue, should you wish to do so, so you can add labels or detailed comments to it. Sometimes, a card you thought was simple and self-contained might turn out to be a bigger task than you anticipated - in that case, it is sensible to create new cards that reference the one they broke off from.
Once your project board has a large number of cards on it, you might want to begin prioritising them. Not all tasks are going to be equally important, and some will require others to be completed before they can even be begun. Common methods of prioritisation include:
-
Vertical position: the vertical arrangement of
cards in a column implicitly represents their importance. High-priority
bugs go to the top of
To Do
, whilst tasks that depend on others go beneath them. This is the easiest one to implement, though you have to remember to correctly place cards when you add them. -
Priority columns: instead of a single
To Do
column, you can have two or more, for example -To Do: Low Priority
andTo Do: High Priority
. When adding a card, you pick which is the appropriate column for it. You can even add a Triage column for newly-added issues that you’ve not yet had time to classify. This format works well for project boards devoted to bugs. - Labels: if you convert each card into an issue, then you can label them with their priority - remember GitHub lets you create custom labels and set their colours. Label colours can provide a very visually clear indication of issue priority but require more administrative work on the project, as each card has to be an issue to be assigned a label. If you choose this route for issue prioritisation - be aware of accessibility issues for colour-blind people when picking colours.
Project Boards vs Milestones
For a good description of differences between the two, have a look at this answer on StackOverflow.
A Project Board answers the question:
“What are we working on at the moment?”
A Milestone answers the question:
“What is remaining to finish off this task?”
Exercise: prioritising issues & planning work (15 minutes)
Use Project Boards and/or Milestones to prioritise issues and plan the first sprint and/or the first lesson release with your team.
Depending on how many issues were registered on your repository, it is possible that you will not be able to work on all the issues in the first sprint. As the development of your lesson progresses, any remaining unresolved issues can be reconsidered and prioritised for another milestone and you can use a Project Board to plan them.
This process of receiving new issues and requirements, prioritisation, and working on them is naturally continuous - with the benefit that at key stages your team is repeatedly re-evaluating what is important and needs to be worked on which helps to ensure real concrete progress against project goals and requirements which may change over time.
Project Governance
In addition to managing your project on a day-to-day basis, you should consider a governance model for your lesson to describe the ground rules of participation, the roles that project participants can take on and the process for decision making within the project. You may wonder why you’d ever need a formal governance process - after all, everyone in your team is collegial, polite and hard-working. However, even among the most harmonious teams you will likely realise you need an agreed way to make decisions and resolve conflicts when your team encounters their first real disagreement.
The moment your collaborator group exceeds 3 or 4 members (and fewer if the collaborators do not all know each other equally well at the outset) you should establish and document some kind of governance process. It will help mitigate any power imbalances which are expressed when one team member (or a group of team members) are more vocal and are able to dominate the decision-making process. It is advised to make these considerations early on, before your project grows too much and introducing structure and process into it becomes more difficult and complicated. Besides, if you do not establish these processes from the start, you are likely to discover the need to do so only when you first encounter disagreement within the team: a situation unlikely to provide perfect conditions for a discussion of governance.
Here are some aspects of governing a project that you should consider. These are borrowed from the Working in teams chapter of Research Software Engineering with Python, a book on how to work productively in small teams where everyone is welcome:
- Codes of Conduct
- meeting rules
- decision-making process
- handling conflict
- making all the above obvious to newcomers
For some other examples and inspirations of governance processes, consider the following:
- Martha’s Rules for discussing and deciding on issues in group meetings (if you cannot access the publication, see Greg Wilson’s explanation of Martha’s rules)
- GitHub’s Minimum Viable Governance (MVG) for establishing a lightweight governance process into free and open source projects that are run in version control systems. In MVG decisions are made through consensus of the project maintainers or determined based on the maintainers’ consideration of a number of factors in “good faith” (when explicit agreement of all maintainers cannot be reached). In reality, consensus-based governance can run you into trouble when you hit an issue where maintainers do not all agree but still want to make progress. Also, the definition of “good faith” is open to interpretation and leaves plenty of room for people, especially the powerful, to get away with acting in bad faith. A system based on voting and majorities may help you get around this issue. MVG is designed for a one organisation-many projects setup and is too elaborate for a single lesson project. However, it includes “boilerplate” template files for a steering committee, charter, governance, Code of Conduct documents, and language laying out a preference for consensus but with voting as a fallback, and other templates that may be helpful for those starting out and unsure about how to get on with establishing a governance process.
- This list of resources related to community governance from The Center for Scientific Collaboration and Community Engagement provides a collection of links to further reading material on this topic. It includes various guides, blog posts, and examples of community governance that may inform the discussions and decisions for your project.
Exercises: decision making process (15 minutes)
As a team read Greg Wilson’s explanation of Martha’s rules on running decision making meetings.
Discuss with your colleagues if it would work for your team and if not - what would you propose. Write down any questions you may have for your trainers.
Keypoints
- GitHub’s features Issues, Mentions and Project Boards can all be used to effectively communicate in a team of collaborators and manage a lesson development project.
- Slack and emailing lists provide communication channels outside of GitHub - for quick day-to-day messaging and more permanent discussions around lesson issues and development, respectively.
- Make sure to establish a governance model for your project early on - to describe the ground rules of participation and the process for decision making within the project.
Content from Break
Last updated on 2022-06-10 | Edit this page
Estimated time 0 minutes
Take a break. If you can, move around and look at something away from your screen to give your eyes a rest.
Content from Collaborating with Newcomers
Last updated on 2023-03-22 | Edit this page
Estimated time 55 minutes
Overview
Questions
- What makes a project welcoming for newcomers?
- What information should I provide about the project to potential collaborators?
- How can I ensure regular progress on lesson development?
Objectives
- Adjust a lesson repository to attract potential collaborators.
- Create and modify issue and pull request templates in GitHub.
- Identify strategies to encourage regular development and maintenance of a lesson.
You may start working on projects by yourself or with a small group of collaborators you already know, but open source projects in the Carpentries community often grow beyond that small group. Community collaboration is the cornerstone of The Carpentries - all curricula and various programmes are developed together by the community members across borders, domains and backgrounds. Most initiatives are done through community consultation and collaboration is used as a pathway to empower people, give members a sense of purpose in the community and realise shared goals.
Collaboration helps bring different perspectives to solving a problem and share the load of the required work to develop, pilot, and, later on, maintain the lesson. People drop in and out of projects for various reasons and their levels of involvement may vary over time due to other commitments - for this reason it is worth taking time from the outset to make a project welcoming for newcomers in order to achieve a steady number of people working on your project at any time. You should plan to make it easy for new collaborators to join, to set up a local workspace so that they can contribute, help them find tasks so that they know what to contribute, and make the contribution process clear so that they know how to contribute. You also want to make it easy to give people credit for their work on your project as well as for others to reuse and give credit to your project. In this episode, we cover best practices for collaborating with newcomers and tools available to help. And remember, anything you do to make it easier for newcomers to contribute will be universally useful for all collaborators.
Documenting Your Lesson
For collaborative projects, it is important to spend the time on ‘external-facing’ features, such as documentation, to make the project as welcoming and as easy to get involved in as possible for newcomers who may not have a deep grasp of the project or know all its existing problems. Such documentation will be useful to yourself and other team members as well, e.g. if you are trying to come back to the project after a break or are reusing it for a new collaboration in the future.
Your lesson documentation should contain the following information, which should be kept up to date.
Description of the Project - README
File
README
, README.txt
or
README.md
is a plain text or Markdown file located in the
project’s root directory representing the default landing or home page
for repositories in GitHub (and similar project repositories) by
convention. It represents the first piece of documentation that people
will see when visiting your lesson repository, hence it should concisely
explain what the lesson is about and who it is for, and contain links
and pointers to further information. For example, README
should include:
- lesson title
- lesson description
-
rendered version of the lesson - even though this
is typically included in the
About
section of the repository, it is always useful to link to the URL where the rendered lesson is available - contact information - include up-to-date email addresses or mailing lists or other details on how to get in touch with the lesson maintainers
-
contributing information - this is an opportunity
to list what kinds of contributions are sought and how to get involved
in lesson development for new contributors. You can provide more details
in a separate
CONTRIBUTING
file within the repository’s root directory and link to it fromREADME
-
credits/acknowledgements - make sure to credit
those who have helped in the lesson’s development or inspired it, and/or
any resources/templates that you have reused. You can also link to a
separate
AUTHORS.md
file within the repository’s root directory to list all the people who contributed to the lesson content (if this list starts to become too large to include in theREADME
itself) -
citation - a convention is to include the citation
information for your lesson in a separate
CITATION
file within the repository’s root directory (and link to it fromREADME
) so others can cite the use of the lesson in their own publications and media and it can also be automatically discovered by other applications. Citation can be a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) issued by a reputable DOI-issuing repository such as Zenodo, which should be obtained as a permanent identifier as soon as your lesson reaches the beta stage, or an appropriate academic publication once your lesson becomes stable and is peer-reviewed. Citation can be contained in a plain text file (CITATION
,CITATION.txt
), a Markdown file (CITATION.md
), or in the recently adopted Citation File Format (CITATION.cff
). The CFF is defined using YAML (which we already encountered in theconfig.yaml
file for the lesson website) and is now the recommended way of storing citations in GitHub. Advantages of using CFF are that GitHub will automatically show the citation information in the sidebar, making it more visible and accessible for visitors to your repository. In addition, metadata fromCITATION.cff
files will automatically be used by Zenodo when registering the DOI for your lesson/project. CFF metadata is also recognised by the Zotero reference manager. -
license - a short description of and a link to the
lesson’s license typically contained in a separate
LICENSE
,LICENSE.txt
orLICENSE.md
file within the repository’s root directory. The lesson repository created from the Carpentries lesson template already contains a defaultLICENSE.md
file, but you should modify this to more accurately describe how the lesson content can be re-used by others.
Instructions for Contributors - CONTRIBUTING
File
CONTRIBUTING
, CONTRIBUTING.txt
or
CONTRIBUTING.md
is a text or Markdown file within the
repository’s root directory where you should provide detailed
description of the ways people can send their contributions, what kinds
of contribution will be credited and in what ways. For example, at what
point would someone be listed as an author and how you will credit
contributions that are not recorded in the commit history of the
project. The latter is particularly important for newcomers who may not
be proficient with the use of GitHub’s features for collaborative work,
such as issues, mentions, pull requests and code review, but could still
provide valuable input and contributions.
Carpentries lesson repositories already have a generic Carpentries
CONTRIBUTING.md
file to get you started. You should review
it and, if need be, modify it to fit your team’s needs and way of
working. For example, you may want to expand on what contributions you
are not looking for if your lesson already contains more
material than can be covered in a typical workshop. You can also detail
all channels on which you are willing to receive contributions on, if
they are different from the defaults included in the file.
Issue and Pull Request Templates
Consider setting up issue and pull request templates to help newcomers who may not have much experience working on collaborative projects in GitHub. Such templates can provide a structure for the issue/pull request description, and/or prompt them to fill in answers to pre-set questions. Both can help contributors raise issues or submit pull requests in a way that is clear, helpful and provides enough information for maintainers to act upon (without going back and forth to extract it). GitHub provides a range of default templates, but you can also write your own.
Other Documentation
Once you have set up the basic documentation about your lesson, you may consider adding the following useful information to your documentation too:
- set-up guides for installing and rendering the lesson locally. In most cases, a link to The Carpentries Workbench documentation will be sufficient. You can also contribute to the Workbench documentation to help improve it for the community.
- how to create and modify the pages in the lesson
Exercise: preparing your repository for collaboration (15 minutes)
Spend some time doing one of the following:
- Modify the
README.md
andCONTRIBUTING.md
files in your repository to provide the relevant information for would-be contributors to your lesson:- the name(s) of the current developer(s), linked to their GitHub profile(s) (README)
- contact information (README, CONTRIBUTING)
- guidance on how people should contribute, and what kinds of contribution you are most interested in receiving (CONTRIBUTING)
- links to any important background information (README)
- links to any funding bodies or host institutes that are supporting the development of the lesson (README)
- Create a new issue or pull request template, or modify an existing one, to guide contributors on how best to begin collaborating with you on GitHub.
Groups of collaborators taking this training together should discuss first how they will assign these tasks between them.
Collaborating on a Lesson
Boosting the Visibility and Attracting New Collaborators
In addition to having the complete documentation in the lesson repository, The Carpentries community provides a number of ways to further raise the visibility of the lesson among the broader community and encourage community members to contribute to its further development. For example:
- listing issues from the lesson repository on The Carpentries Help Wanted page
- featuring your lesson in the Incubator Lesson Spotlight
- writing a blog post about the lesson for The Carpentries Blog, and/or attending a community discussion call to promote the lesson
- advertising the lesson at various Carpentries mailing lists - e.g. general discussion, instructors, regional communities or specific curriculum lists
You should also consider including your lesson in Hacktoberfest and similar wider community open source events aimed at encouraging people to contribute to open source projects periodically throughout the year.
Issue Labelling for Newcomers
You can encourage contributions to your lesson from newcomers by
using specific labels on issues to highlight suitable opportunities to
help. Apply the good first issue
or
help wanted
labels to issues in your repository to indicate
that the maintainers will particularly welcome help or pull requests
fixing such issues.
Noticing When Something Happens
GitHub implements a comprehensive notifications
system to keep you up-to-date with activities in the lesson
repository. GitHub also provides an additional useful notification
feature for collaborative work - Mentions. The mention
system notifies team members when somebody else references them in an
issue, comment or pull request - you can use this to notify people when
you want to check a detail with them, or let them know something has
been fixed or changed (much easier than writing out all the same
information again in an email!). You can use the mention system to link
to individual GitHub accounts or whole teams for mentioning multiple
people. Typing @
in GitHub will bring up a list of all
accounts and teams linked to the repository that can be “mentioned”.
Check out GitHub’s documentation on setting notifications on individual repository. You can choose whether to watch or unwatch an individual repository, or can choose to only be notified of certain event types such as issues, pull requests, mentions, etc.
Saying “No”
Not every contribution is a good fit for a project and, especially as your lesson becomes more stable, you will probably not want to accept every suggested change. If you receive a pull request or issue that does not fit to your lesson, consider the following points to help you politely decline without demotivating the contributor from contributing to your lesson (or another open source project) again:
- Thank them for taking the time to contribute.
- Explain why the contribution does not fit into the lesson, and offer suggestions for improvement if you’re able.
-
Link to relevant documentation, if you have it.
Notes about the design of the lesson (e.g. from this training) and any
relevant discussion threads can be very helpful here. If you notice
similar repeated requests/contributions, you might want to address them
in your documentation (e.g. in the
CONTRIBUTING.md
file) to save yourself time in future. - Close the request.
The advice above is taken from The Carpentries Maintainer Onboarding curriculum. That resource, and the Best Practices for Maintainers guide from GitHub on which it is based, make excellent further reading as you prepare to transition from your role as an active developer into another as a responsive and responsible maintainer of your lesson.
Making Progress
The following practices have been shown to help maintain steady progress with lesson development:
- being responsive to notifications about activities and mentions
- scheduling regular co-working/sprinting sessions with team members attaching your sprint sessions to other open source community activities, which may offer goodies, rewards and prizes for participants, can provide motivation and activity spikes
- working alongside other members of The Carpentries community at Maintainer or lesson development co-working sessions
- blocking time in your calendar for issue triage/solo material writing
- planning lesson pilots in advance to help set targets
Make sure to join the Incubator lesson developers mailing list to keep an eye on announcements and discussions relating to lesson development in the Carpentry community.
Exercise: planning to collaborate (10 minutes)
Use this time to plan how you will continue to make progress with developing your lesson, and ensure that you are ready to respond to external contributors when they arrive at your lesson. This time is yours to do with as you think is best for yourself and your project, but you might consider using it to do one or more of the following:
- schedule a lesson development co-working session with your collaborators, and/or mark the next community co-working session in your calendar.
- ensure that your the notification settings are appropriately configured for your lesson repository.
- contact The Carpentries team to ensure issues from your lesson will be included on the Help Wanted page.
Keypoints
- “If a project doesn’t make a good first impression, newcomers may wait a long time before giving it a second chance” - Karl Fogel, the author of “Producing Open Source Software: How to Run a Successful Free Software Project”.
- You should make an active effort to attract potential collaborators and try to make them all feel welcome and included. The Carpentries Help Wanted page and featuring in the Incubator Lesson Spotlight can boost the visibility of your lesson. Creating the appropriate documentation and using GitHub features such as labels, and issue/pull request templates will help lower the barriers for contributions to your project.
- When you design your lesson with new contributors and increased accessibility in mind, you make things better for everyone in the process.
- Scheduling regular co-working sessions, blocking time in the calendar for issue triage, and setting and being responsive to GitHub notifications will ensure regular progress on the lesson.
Content from Final Wrap-up
Last updated on 2022-07-26 | Edit this page
Estimated time 30 minutes
Overview
Questions
- What steps can you take to be a good collaborator?
- How can we improve this training?
Objectives
- Draw a diagram or compose a written summary of the key concepts from this training.
- Articulate constructive feedback.
Looking Ahead
We have reached the end of this training. By now, you should have made good progress towards a first draft of your lesson.
Referring back to the life cycle stages for lessons described earlier in the curriculum, your lesson is still in pre-alpha but hopefully approaching alpha, when it is ready to be taught in full for the first time.
As you and your collaborators continue to iterate over the lesson - teaching it, gathering feedback, reflecting on the experience, and improving it for next time - the lesson will pass through alpha into the beta and stable stages (perhaps via peer review in The Carpentries Lab).
Your role as the original developers of the lesson, and the kind of interactions/contributions taking place on your repository, will change as you move through these stages.
Life cycle stage | Type of contribution | Your role |
---|---|---|
pre-alpha | new content and whole new episodes; changes/additions to lesson objectives | active development; onboarding new collaborators; project management |
alpha | improving existing content; adding/expanding/removing content; polishing changes/typo fixes | active development; reviewing changes; documenting feedback/actions based on pilot workshops; project management |
beta | feedback from pilot workshops; polishing changes; expanding instructor notes; suggestions for major overhauls/reorganisations | recruiting pilot instructors; reviewing changes; guiding contributors |
stable | feedback from workshops; polishing changes; new/updated content | reviewing changes; guiding contributors; onboarding new maintainers; stepping away from the project |
Farewell and Feedback
Thank you for following this training. We hope you found it helpful to build a foundation for your current lesson project and to prepare you to collaborate on other projects in the future.
To bring the training to a close, the Trainers will lead a number of activities to gather feedback and help you reflect on the experience.
One Up, One Down (10 min)
Provide one up, one down feedback on the entire Collaborative Lesson Development Training. Remember:
- Say only one thing, and try not to duplicate. This gets harder for those who come later!
- Trainers should try not to respond, only record responses (e.g. in the Etherpad). This is also hard, but important!
Reflection exercise (15 min)
Take this time to reflect on what you have learned in this last part of the training, and take some action to plan to successfully complete the development of your lesson after you leave. It is up to you how you use this time, but you might find some inspiration in the prompts below.
- How could you use the project management features of GitHub to prepare for the next stage of the lesson development process?
- If you have been working in a collaborative group, what steps could your group take to improve the way you work together for the remainder of the project?
- If you have been working on the lesson alone so far, what steps could you take to find new collaborators to help you with the further development of your lesson?
- Based on the experience of teaching a section of your lesson, do the objectives you wrote for your lesson still seem realistic? Can you identify anything that can be added or removed now that you have completed a trial run?